Jersey Joe Walcott v Michael Dokes

Me too.

 

As a bettor, I wouldn't touch this with a 10 foot pole. Two fighters who typify the term "hot and cold"... Mike has the physical advantages, speed, size and when fresh, output. I will give him the edge with little confidence.

 

I feel Walcott had motre power.

 

Walcott was a far better fighter than Dokes but Michael`s hand speed would bother Joe, however Walcott`s erratic movement would be something Dokes never faced, Dokes could match Marciano`s volume punching but not his power and wasn`t a good inside fighter like Rock, Walcott would take Dokes out different class.

 

If he was a far better fighter why was he beaten so often?

 

Overall, historically I give Walcott the edge as the better fighter to take a UD, but like others with no confidence

 

Me three.

 

We've been through this a million times....this is why we MUST take you off to SEA

 

Walcott, by decision. Should be but with these two it's hard to say..

 

Dokes by close unanimous decision.

 

He did, Mark. Definitely. His power is actually underrated imo.

 

I would make Walcott favorite, but Dokes is the kind of guy who might beat him one time in three.

 

Walcott SD 15

 

Hey Janitor. How old are you? Just a random question.