If only he was more dedicated! I was one of the few that believed a fully focused Witherspoon would have given Tyson problems.
Walcott in his prime would have given the 80`s Tyson problems also and had the power to get his respect.
Jersey Joe , faster and quicker on his feet with decent power.Tim on his best form wins,good power jab and chin,but if he is out of shape and unfocused Joe takes it.
These are two fighters where one would be unlikely to go 3-0 against the other. They are tow of the best heavyweight contenders of all time, and the fact that one of them held the lineal title and the other didn't, might have been down to luck and timing. I am going to give the nod to Walcott here on balance, based on style and consistency (yes I did say consistency), but no money is going down!
Two guys I like watching. Walcott is like a text book of info watching him work. Tim in shape is a handful for anybody and has some of Walcotts qualities. I got Walcott by a slight margin. A little to crafty and cagey .
Super Composite Tim, i.e. how we wanted him to be with all his potential could certainly win; the product we actually have in front of us doesn't
