Jersey Joe Walcott vs Ingo

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Nov 9, 2021.


  1. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,452
    12,758
    Jun 30, 2005
    Which one of these sneaky punchers manages to con his opponent into walking onto his Sunday punch first?
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2021
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,198
    26,478
    Feb 15, 2006
    I would make Walcott the favorite, by one means or another.
     
    mr. magoo and djanders like this.
  3. Stiches Yarn

    Stiches Yarn Active Member Full Member

    1,219
    1,918
    Jan 2, 2021
    I think it walcott was inshape, he takes it.
    I believe he was just a better fighter in almost everything.
    BUT, if Walcott showed up unprepared physically, this would not be a good night for him.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  4. Tonto62

    Tonto62 Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,040
    4,967
    Mar 26, 2011
    Walcott ko's the Swede.
     
  5. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,519
    10,701
    Aug 22, 2004
    Walcott without too much trouble.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  6. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Bob N Weave Full Member

    16,026
    17,708
    Sep 22, 2021
    This content is protected

    This stylish mother ****er wins big.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  7. AwardedSteak863

    AwardedSteak863 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,742
    10,474
    Aug 16, 2018
    I like Walcott but it would not surprise me at all if Joe gets caught with that right hand and Koed. Joe was knocked out by lesser fighters than Ingo. With that said, I will say Walcott by UD or Kate stoppage.
     
  8. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,087
    Oct 28, 2017
    I'd pick Walcott but Ingo would certainly be capable of winning
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  9. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,875
    Feb 21, 2009
    I see no reason to favor Johansson in this. Jersey Joe should take this one, IMHO, of course.
     
    Journeyman92 and cross_trainer like this.
  10. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,632
    3,436
    Jul 10, 2005
    Walcott the favorite, and by Ko imo, I think he stops Ingo in 8 rounds or less. BUT if Ingo lands his right, it would not shock me if Walcott is counted out. Ingo had that type of power.
     
  11. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,452
    12,758
    Jun 30, 2005
    The biggest thing that makes me lean toward Walcott is that it seems more likely that Walcott's encountered something like Ingo before.

    The converse is probably not true of Ingo. I have my doubts that Sweden's amateur or pro scene prepared Johansson all that well. He had the raw talent, but...
     
    Journeyman92 and djanders like this.
  12. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,875
    Feb 21, 2009
    Yes. That and Walcott had more ways available for him to win against Johansson. I believe that Ingo only had the proverbial puncher's chance against Jersey Joe.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  13. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,452
    12,758
    Jun 30, 2005
    True, with the caveat that Walcott wasn't exactly a decision-grabbing slickster like, say, Machen. Walcott was presumably inviting Louis to play whack-a-mole with his noggin not to show off, but to set up something fight-ending.
     
  14. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Bob N Weave Full Member

    16,026
    17,708
    Sep 22, 2021
    They were just honestly two different breeds of fighters look at there careers, style and everything around them.
     
  15. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    17,452
    12,758
    Jun 30, 2005
    Walcott and Ingo? Hm.

    I think of them as broadly similar in overall strategy -- somewhat mobile punchers who tried to sucker their opponents onto big punches -- although they used different tools to get there.

    Ingo strikes me as a crude attempt by a very talented man to build a style that could pull that strategy off. But because Ingo came from the boxing equivalent of a cave with a box of scraps, he only really built his style around one trick. Albeit a good one. One wonders about what the 1930s meatgrinder that produced Walcott would have made out of Ingo.

    Just my $0.02, for what it's worth.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.