Jess Willard vs Frank Bruno

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Jun 1, 2023.


Who wins and how

  1. Bruno KO/TKO

    88.2%
  2. Willard KO/TKO

    5.9%
  3. Bruno UD

    5.9%
  4. Willard UD

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  5. Bruno SD

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  6. Willard SD

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  7. Draw

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. CANNONBALL

    CANNONBALL Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,670
    802
    Mar 18, 2007
    Willard would be a sitting duck for Bruno's heavy jab and right hand and would be blown away Rudi Gauwe style in 2/3 rounds.
    Frank didnt have much trouble with big, stationary journeymen with little defence..........and make no mistake, Willard would be journeyman level in the modern era
     
    Eddie Ezzard likes this.
  2. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,059
    Oct 25, 2006
    Willard is not Lewis. He gets beaten up.
     
    Arch Stanton likes this.
  3. Pat M

    Pat M Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,707
    4,277
    Jun 20, 2017
    Frank Bruno, a good boxer who beat some good boxers vs. a guy who walked off a farm at 29 years old and started boxing? Willard looks terrible on film, stiff, unskilled, and not athletic. Mark Gastineau and Ed "Too Tall" Jones were two big guys who started boxing late and they were excellent athletes, but neither was able to overcome their late start in boxing (probably would have been champions in Willard's time). Bruno by quick, easy knockout. I doubt Bruno ever fought anybody worse than Willard.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  4. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Mauling Mormon’s banned Full Member

    19,739
    21,764
    Sep 22, 2021
    Bruno was pretty much only very strong, but if he doesn’t know how to actually fight on the inside strength will mean very little, mismatch. Big Jess wears him down in the clinch of heaven and sends him to hell with his Johnson buster right.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  5. Journeyman92

    Journeyman92 Mauling Mormon’s banned Full Member

    19,739
    21,764
    Sep 22, 2021
    Holding and hitting in the modern era is a sign of desperation, hitting then holding is an art- see Duran.
     
    cross_trainer likes this.
  6. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,545
    12,961
    Sep 21, 2017
    15
     
  7. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    31,671
    38,977
    Jul 24, 2004
    Bruno, UD or BS Brit stoppage.
     
  8. GoldenHulk

    GoldenHulk Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,961
    5,738
    Jan 7, 2007
    I like Bruno early.
     
  9. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    12,737
    3,589
    Jul 10, 2005
    Bruno 12 rounds, Willard 45 plus.
     
  10. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    17,545
    12,961
    Sep 21, 2017
    Would the fight even go that long?
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  11. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,611
    21,831
    Jul 30, 2014
    No it wouldn’t. :lol: I’d honestly be surprised if it went three.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  12. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,904
    5,598
    Jun 24, 2017
    You been watching too many hills have eyes, texas chainsaw massacre horror flicks
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  13. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,296
    27,906
    Jan 3, 2007
    Looking at film of Willard it’s hard to favor him aside from perhaps a puncher’s chance. He holds his guard dangerously low. Has no footwork and diminishes his own size advantage by over bending his knees. He’d be too easy of a target for most quality fighters starting from the 1930’s onward. It’s hardly a stretch to surmise that someone like Bob Pastor would have beaten the crap out of him

    This content is protected
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2023
    BCS8 and InMemoryofJakeLamotta like this.