Jess Willard vs the following opposition

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Mar 19, 2020.


  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,204
    11,679
    Sep 21, 2017
    1992 Razor Ruddock
    Michael Grant
    Hasim Rahman
    1998/99 Evander Holyfield
    2002 Mike Tyson
    Frank Bruno
    1993 Tony Tucker
    Tommy Morrison
    David Tua
    Shannon Briggs
    Ray Mercer
    Gary Mason and finally
    2003 Vitali Klitchsko

    Could Willard use his size strength and skill to defeat every man on this ledger?
     
  2. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,939
    Nov 21, 2009
    Love reading about Jess and his life. A real interesting man.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,571
    27,215
    Feb 15, 2006
    Holyfield and Klitschko start as clear favorites over him.

    I am guessing that he wins some and loses some against the rest.

    I would make him a clear favorite over Grant, Bruno, Morrison, and Mason.
     
  4. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,629
    May 13, 2014
    Jake Lamotta stirring the **** again.
     
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,493
    46,030
    Feb 11, 2005
    They all beat him, most embarrassingly so. But I actually do have a reservation about 2002 Tyson. He was on the verge of really falling off the cliff, coke-addled, boozer, over a decade past his prime.
     
  6. KasimirKid

    KasimirKid Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,233
    3,366
    Jun 1, 2018
    I don't really know the attributes of many of the opponents put forward, but in a fight scheduled for 45 rounds, as I remember the Willard-Johnson fight was, I give Willard a chance against some of those listed, i. e., Shannon Briggs and Frank Bruno who I remember seeing, if the fight goes longer than 20 rounds. Don't know much about the other guys. Under modern 12- or 15-round bouts, I don't see Willard doing much against modern heavyweights. He is an interesting historical curiosity, however.
     
  7. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,410
    8,846
    Oct 8, 2013
    Briggs would lose. Tyson 02 and Morrison have chance to gas out late if Willard could absorb a beaten. but if Dempsey at 188 got him out i doubt the bigger guys couldn't do the same.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  8. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,204
    11,679
    Sep 21, 2017
    Yes he was
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  9. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,204
    11,679
    Sep 21, 2017
    I do think that Willard would give them some very tough fights. He may stop many of them.
     
  10. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,463
    Jan 10, 2007
    I would consider him an underdog against all of them. He would have had the best chances to beat 2002 version of Tyson out of these guys in my opinion. 2002 version of Tyson had beyond awful stamina. In 2002 Tyson was slightly better than he was in 2005, but Willard was also better than Kevin McBride.
     
    Last edited: Mar 20, 2020
  11. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,929
    36,718
    Jul 24, 2004
    I honestly think Willard would struggle against Tye Fields. He could win if he dragged the fight past 25 rounds like he did with Johnson.
     
  12. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,204
    11,679
    Sep 21, 2017
    I think Willard would poleaxe Grant and Golota the way Lewis did.
     
    The Morlocks likes this.