How does Jim Braddock do against the likes of: Gassiev Briedis Adamek Jirov Lebedev Huck Dorticos etc We'll leave Usyk out for now, as I don't think that's much of a discussion, but feel free to consider him as well.
I actually think he does really well. I think he would beat Gassiev, but I don't think he was consistent enough to not lose one or two.
I'll take a stab. My first gut reaction. I didn't give each matchup a ton of thought. Jim Braddock > Marvin Camel (I'd actually have favored Mate Parlov over Braddock) Carlos DeLeon > Jim Braddock Ossie Ocasio toss-up Jim Braddock (lean toward Ocasio) S.T. Gordon toss-up Jim Braddock (lean toward Gordon) Jim Braddock > Lee Roy Murphy Jim Braddock > Piet Crous Jim Braddock > Alfonso Ratliff Jim Braddock > Bernard Benton Jim Braddock > Ricky Parkey Dwight Qawi > Jim Braddock Evander Holyfield > Jim Braddock Taoufik Belbouli > Jim Braddock Jim Braddock > Glen McCrory Jim Braddock > Robert Daniels Jim Braddock > Boone Pultz Jim Braddock > Jeff Lampkin Jim Braddock > Magna Havna Jim Braddock > Massimiliano Duran Jim Braddock > Bobby Czyz Jim Braddock > Anaclet Wamba Jim Braddock > James Warring Jim Braddock > Tyrone Booze Alfred "Ice" Cole > Jim Braddock Jim Braddock > Marcus Bott Jim Braddock > Nestor Giovannini Orlin Norris > Jim Braddock Dariusz Michalczewski > Jim Braddock Ralf Rocchigiani > Jim Braddock Nate "Mr." Miller > Jim Braddock Jim Braddock > Marcelo Dominguez Jim Braddock > Adolpho Washington Jim Braddock > Uriah Grant Carl Thompson > Jim Braddock Imamu Mayfield > Jim Braddock Jim Braddock toss up Fabrice Tiozzo (lean toward Braddock) Juan Carlos Gomez > Jim Braddock Jim Braddock > Arthur Williams Johnny Nelson > Jim Braddock Jim Braddock toss up Vasili Jirov (lean toward Braddock) Virgil Hill > Jim Braddock Jim Braddock > Wayne Braithwaite Jean Marc Mormeck > Jim Braddock James Toney > Jim Braddock Jim Braddock > Kelvin Davis Jim Braddock > O'Neil Bell Jim Braddock toss up Enzo Maccarinelli (lean toward Braddock because of Enzo's chin) Krzysztof Wlodarczyk toss up Jim Braddock (lean toward Wlodarczyk) Steve Cunningham > Jim Braddock David Haye > Jim Braddock Guillermo Jones > Jim Braddock Jim Braddock > Giacobbe Fragomeni Tomasz Adamek > Jim Braddock Jim Braddock > Victor Emilio Ramirez Marco Huck > Jim Braddock Jim Braddock toss up Zsolt Erdei (lean toward Braddock) Jim Braddock > Denis Lebedev Jim Braddock > Krzysztof Glowacki Tony Bellew > Jim Braddock Yoan Pablo Hernandez > Jim Braddock Jim Braddock > Murat Gassiev Mairis Briedis > Jim Braddock Oleksandr Usyk > Jim Braddock
How likely is he to do that when he had such a spotty record in his own time? Are you arguing that every single fighter that ever beat Braddock was better than the best cruiserweights of the past twenty years? If so then that's a ridiculous statement.
How are you arguing that the cruiserweights are better than the guy who went 8 rounds with Joe Louis and knocked him down? The man who beat Tommy Farr? And a (to be fair, goofing off) Max Baer? Braddock's early career is no real representation of his later career, his prime
I like Gassiev. His fights are usually fun to watch. But Braddock had 75 pro fights, and he wasn't always at his best, yet he was really only stopped once. By Joe Louis. After he had Joe Louis on the floor. (His other stoppage loss was on a cut.) So I don't envision Gassiev stopping him. And if it goes 15 rounds (or even 12), I think Braddock moves a lot, throws a lot, lands shots from odd angles, and takes the decision. Gassiev is very strong and quick. But that shutout against Usyk showed how he isn't able to adjust at all. Even if things aren't working. He's good at what he does, but adjusting or switching plans isn't his strong suit. The guys I picked over Braddock tended to be people who were more boxer/punchers/counterpunchers. The exceptions were Qawi and S.T. Gordon. I originally picked Braddock over Gordon. Braddock would probably win, now that I think about it. But Gordon and Qawi did beat guys who held heavyweight titles. So I gave Gordon the benefit of the doubt. I don't see Gassiev doing that (beating any heavyweight beltholders). I was never as high on him as others were. He's good, but there were guys on here picking him to beat Wilder. I think the Gassiev hype got a little exaggerated.
What do you consider Braddock's prime years, and which of his losses barring Louis do you think are relevant to the discussion?
I think for Braddock to beat Gassiev he'd need to be attacking him non-stop, not giving him a chance to breathe or fire back, and I don't see him as being active enough or fast enough to accomplish that. Gassiev I think takes him apart in a very clinical fashion with those short, sharp combinations to the head and body while avoiding or blocking the majority of Braddock's looping, telegraphed blows. I can't see the Usyk performance having any relevance here. Gassiev doesn't seem like the most adaptable fighter (time will tell on that point) but Braddock isn't going to show him anything he hasn't seen before.
I don't know. I'm no Braddock expert. I've seen all the fights of him available. I've read the same books everyone else has. I've watched his interviews. He started off his career great. Then, because of nagging injuries, and problems in his personal life, and close decisions that didn't go his way, he went on a losing streak for some years. Then he rebounded at the end of his career and put together another good run. That's happens to fighters. There were about five years in there where Evander Holyfield lost a lot - because of a bad heart, or Ped use, or chronic shoulder injuries, whatever. Or you have fighters like Jimmy Young who are average, then become one of the best in the world, then are awful, then become contenders again, then are awful again. A lot of fighters don't follow a nice arc where they were prospects, then contenders, then champ, then they decline, then they retire ... and you can say "his prime was right here." Braddock at his best was very good. When picking, I just thought of Braddock at his best versus the others at their bests. That's all. I wasn't thinking of certain years or anything. When Braddock was fighting early in his career or at his best at heavyweight, he was under the cruiserweight limit. So you can really go with any strong point in his career.
It's all about styles. Hill and Bellew can adjust in fights, and box at a distance, Lebedev and Gassiev not so much.
Lebedev is a really good counter puncher who became a more educated mover as he got older. He’s not just some come forward bulldozer. Gassiev moved and outboxed Dorticos when center ring wasn’t working for him. He has good timing, fast hands and it took a generational talent to outbox him.
It's not like Gassiev had 300 amateur fights and has been exposed to every style. He had a handful of amateur fights (like 20) and then turned pro and has fought the usual suspects for the most part and a number of nobodies, too.