Jim Corbett vs. Archie Moore

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Aug 5, 2009.


  1. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,011
    Jun 30, 2005
    15 rounds, 1940's era rules and gloves. Ref's a little lenient with clinching, holding & hitting, etc.

    Who wins?

    A couple good-quality videos of Corbett:

    [yt]TuAcbUV1hFo[/yt]

    [yt]k7ZXB7Gjw1E[/yt]

    [yt]tIfcYJpUig0[/yt]

    http://orphanfilmsymposium.blogspot.com/2008_05_01_archive.html (scroll down until you see the playable video of Corbett showing his techniques to Tunney)
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,636
    47,329
    Mar 21, 2007
    The pick calls for a LOT of speculation.

    I'll roll with Corbett. I like his combination of speed, points gathering left and durablity eek out the decision down the straigh in a reasonably close fight.

    Moore could definitely win.
     
    Anubis likes this.
  3. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    McGrain you really rate the old timers H2H but from what i have seen, and saw pictures of and read

    there wasnt alot of combination punching and surely a combination puncher throughing constant combos at them would trouble them seriously
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,636
    47,329
    Mar 21, 2007
    If you are right, then that is why this thread calls for a lot of specualtion.

    Corbett was a big, fast, durable athlete. If he was boxing in the 1940's he would have your coveted 1940's skillset. I'm speculating as to how this would translate, from your point of view.
     
    Anubis likes this.
  5. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    ah got you.

    Corbett could translate well. As you say he was fast strong and durable. He also had great footwork, i think this helps him out in this time but i cant really say how hed acquire other skills or techniques.

    Id rather compare them on what he know they can and cannot do etc.... Id still pick older fighters from this era over 'modern' ones as they still had great skills.
     
    Anubis likes this.
  6. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,011
    Jun 30, 2005
    I think you might have misunderstood the 1940's reference; my apologies for being unclear.

    I meant that the size of the gloves, leniency of the referee, rules, and general conditions mirror those of the early 40's. I didn't mean that we should move Corbett's birthdate up a few decades so that he becomes a pro during the 1930s and early 40's.

    Assume for this thread that Corbett uses his "old style" boxing methods.
     
  7. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    18,216
    14,011
    Jun 30, 2005
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,636
    47,329
    Mar 21, 2007
    OK, that's my fault CT, i'm shitfaced. My new take -

    Moore would win. He'd be a tiny bit more active and he'd take a decision, quite wide, lots of close rounds, with an interesting last third. The thing is, Corbett's style is perfect for his era. Moore has a near-perfect style for his. The two aren't far apart in terms of skill - though Moore has a clear edge IMO - or athleticism, where Corbett has a slim edge. Corbett is more durable and has better resistance, but it has to be said that I don't see a lot of activity here. Corbett would be looking to pot-shot and "joust" versus a very, very clever quick opponent who has good movement and two excellent hands.

    But assuming Moore isn't worried about being robbed (you don't mean that? with the 1940's reference and the colour issue?) I see him controlling the pace and keeping the activity low to take a pretty safe decision.
     
  9. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    90
    Nov 10, 2008
    i mixed up my corbetts and my jeffries
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,452
    26,957
    Feb 15, 2006
    Instinctivley I would pick Moore but it would be a bit of a shot in the dark.

    The closest thing to Corbett that Moore has ever fought is probably Charlie Burley for whatever that is worth.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,636
    47,329
    Mar 21, 2007
    I don't like the Burley-Corbett comparison for the sake of Moore's fight with Charley. Charley's "bigger man" plan might be quite like Corbett's style, but it sounds an awful lot like Charley didn't treat Moore like a bigger man when they fought.

    Incidently, he didn't treat the biggest man, JD Turner like a big man when he fought him...was hugely busy in that fight, I think.
     
  12. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,341
    Jun 29, 2007
    Corbett would be my pick. Morre could not put away Charles in three shots, and Chalres liked to slug a bit.
     
  13. BUDW

    BUDW Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,910
    811
    Nov 23, 2007
    Archie would KO him,look at those low hands sloppy.
     
  14. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    Corbett was ruined by a single body shot from a middleweight.

    Moore would get to him and flatten him.
     
    bolo specialist likes this.
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,533
    28,769
    Jun 2, 2006
    I would say Bert Lytell.Burley had power as well as skills ,Corbett did not.