Jim Corbett vs Joe Jeannette

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 70sFan865, Jul 7, 2020.


Who would have won?

  1. Jim Corbett

    71.4%
  2. Joe Jeannette

    28.6%
  1. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,154
    Feb 11, 2005
    One of these things is not like the other...

    Corbett's top 5 wins:
    1) Alcoholic, completely shot Sullivan
    2) 21 yr old Joe Choynski
    3)165 pound Charlie Mitchell
    4) Jake Kilrain
    5) A faked win over Kid McCoy

    Jeanette's Top 5 wins:
    1) Sam Langford KO8
    2) Sam McVea KO49
    3) Sam Langford Dec 12
    4) Battling Jim Johnson NWS10
    5) Sandy Ferguson Dec. 12

    And I've thrown out the Carpentier and Johnson DQ wins...
     
    Webbiano likes this.
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,154
    Feb 11, 2005
    Point out his moments of excellent infighting.
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    I've seen what's out there, I just don't see any good inside work from Corbett.I'm not saying he wasnt competent at it, I just don't see it in the footage we have of him.
     
  4. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    I said he was good clincher, not infighter. His whole gameplan against Fitz was to jab and grab. You can see it on this video:

    This content is protected


    He jabbed and then clinched quickly. Sometimes mixed it up with straight rights and one-two combos, but it's that strength in cinches that troubled Fitzsimmons the most.
     
  5. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    Again, clinchiing is not infighting. Wladimir was a beast in clinches, but he wasn't good infighter.

    As I said above, Corbett jabbed and grabbed against Fitzsimmons just after first round. It's there in footage we have.

    As to one example of Corbett's dirty clinching tactics, here is short clip:

    This content is protected
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    I don't see anything to draw conclusions from in that brief clip,just a tangle.
    Fitz was troubled by Corbett's speed and hit and get-away tactics not his clinching. Fitz was between 20 -30 pounds lighter than the mature Jeannette.
    Corbett's best opponents were
    Jackson
    Fitz
    Jeffries
    Sharkey
    How many of them did he beat?
     
  7. BitPlayerVesti

    BitPlayerVesti Boxing Drunkie Full Member

    8,584
    11,099
    Oct 28, 2017
    You mean
    1) Langford, a small middleweight who'd never fought at heavyweight
    2) This guy
    This content is protected

    3) An overweight and declining Sam Langford
    4) A journeyman, that he also dropped NWS decisions to
    5) Another journeyman, who he also dropped a fight to

    And throw in a controversial decision over an undersized Carpentier
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2020
    70sFan865 likes this.
  8. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,574
    May 30, 2019
    Then try to watch closer.
    He was troubled by Corbett's speed, it's true but watch actual footage. Corbett did a lot of clinching, he fought in Wladmir-esque manner. He jabbed and clinched quickly. It's on film, you don't need to rely on secondary sources.
    True and Fitz is MUCH bigger puncher than Jeannette.
    What is your point? Jeannette didn't win his most important fights either.
     
  9. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    29,560
    36,122
    Jan 8, 2017
  10. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007

    Fair and balanced stuff, eh Seamus?

    1. How old was Sam Langford for that fight in 1905? 19 years old and I bet under a 150 pounds. Thats your #1 win. Smaller and younger than Charlie Mitchell.

    2. Jeannette had ability and multiple chances to fight a lilted Mcvey. Sure he won his share. Mcvey won a match in 1909.

    3. He also lost to Battling Jim Johnson twice.

    4. And to Ferguson once.

    5. Langford beat Jeannette in their most significant matches in 1908, 1910, 1911, and 1913 when they were in their primes.
    Did Jeanette ever beat a prime Langford between 1908-1914? As you might have guess, no he did not. I'd have to double check, I'll let you do that

    **My point every one of his best wins beat him, some multiple times**

    I'll be fair and throw out Joe's two losses to Kid Norfolk and not mention Harry Wills who owned Jeanette.

    There is no evidence the Kid McCoy fight was fake, read the news reviews it was a war while it lasted.

    I have read in to Jeannette as he's an interesting guy who never got his due, No historian or promoter of the times ranked him above Corbett.

    Corbett only lost to the very best. Jeanette lost to some mediocre opposition. There's the difference.
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    He did beat;
    McVey
    Langford
    Carpentier
    Ferguson
    I think that is a superior winning resume. Unless you think a totally shot, bloated ,alcoholic Sullivan who had been inactive for years is a particularly note worthy win?
    A washed up middleweight Mitchell and a couple of LPR guys is the extent of his winning resume.
    NB Jeannette had 14 fights when he defeated Langford the first time. Langford 60.

    "Wills owned Jeannette?" Did he?
    They fought 3 times .
    Jeannette 33 & 34 drew with Wills and Wills beat a 40 years old Jeannette on points ,is that owning?
    Jeannette beat a 32 years old 159 fight Langford in 1915, that tops anything Corbett ever did!
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2020
  12. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,992
    36,789
    Jul 24, 2004
    I'd like to point out that in those days hitting while in a clinch was usually not allowed unless one hand was free. Corbett clinched so as to deny his opponent from hitting him and not because he was good at infighting, which by definition was not allowed.
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    George Siler the referee ,stated that for this fight either man could hit on the break as long as one hand was free.
     
    FrankinDallas likes this.
  14. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    29,992
    36,789
    Jul 24, 2004
    That was a great fight, wasn't it? Our seats allowed us a clear view to the combatants.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,727
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    I wasnt sitting, I was working Fitz's corner.
     
    FrankinDallas likes this.