Jim Jeffries A Man Among Old Inactive Men

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Dec 7, 2010.


  1. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Could you elaborate on these "exhibitions" please.

    For sure, "exhibitions" could denote some sort of respectable series of tune-ups against professional boxers. Alternatively it could mean some sort of cabaret or vaudeville act, sparring with a circus midget or tap-dancing around a bear. Or any many of things in-between.
     
  2. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Those were the best availabe in his era?

    Whatever happened to the argument that it was hard to become the top back in the day because compeition was stiff because boxing was then very popular and the pool of participants were much deeper?

    If that was the best available during Jeffries time, then I can definitely argue that Wlad/Vitali is greater than him.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that Jeffries has one of the best records in terms of taking on the best available challengers, of any heavyweight champion from any era.

    If you don't like his choices of title challengers in some cases, then I have to respond that they uneoquivocaly the ones that the media were demanding for him to fight.

    Jeffries took on the three best contenders in the division inside his first year as champion. Fitzsimmons, Sharkey and Corbett would be a hell of a first year as champion in any era, never mind one where the lst two champions took long sabaticals.

    Jeffries did come allong at a time when the division was contoled by two ageing former champions (Fitzsimmons and Corbett), like Rocky Marciano did. Lets not forgett that these two ageing champions, beat the three best contenders of the up and coming generation between them in a period of a month, while Jeffries was champion. Fitz Sharkey, Fitz Ruhlin and Corbett McCoy all took place inside a month.

    Most crass about the criticism of Jeffries title reign, is the assumption that Jeffries and his challengers were constantly available throughout his title reign. The fact that Jeffries was unavailable for significant periods due to injuries, as were his oponents, is conveniently ignored.
     
  4. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Hm, I wouldn´t call Bob Fitzsimmons or Tommy Burns circus midgets.
     
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Thanks.
    :good

    I never knew about those exhibitions. Any eyewitness accounts available ?
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006

    Maybe not available for all his reign but he had a 3 years gap, in between rematching both Fitz and Corbett,surely both could have met him sooner?
    Jeffries fought
    Twice in 1899[ when he won the title].
    Twice in 1900
    Three times in 1901
    Once in 1902
    Once in 1903
    Once in 1904.
    That is his title reign, so when was he" unavailable?"

    I haven't conveniently ignored anything.Have I posted anything that is inaccurate here?
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
    Jeffries sustained a serious injury to his left arm in training for the Sharkey fight, and re injured it either in training for the Corbett fight, or in the fight itself. At this point the injury was so serious that it was thought that it would force Jeffries retirment. What it did was force a significant period of inactiveity while it recovered.

    Jeffries was out of the ring for 18 months while the arm recoverd then took the Griffin and Kennedy bouts as warm up fights. His effective return to defending the title at world level was the Ruhlin fight.

    At this stage Bob Fitzsimmons was seen as the top contender and Ruhlin was seen as the second best contender, but Fitzsimmons had himself anounced his retirment. Perhaps Fitz was playing for a better share of the gate receipts. In the final event the Ruhlin fight was signed. This then leaves his next two opponents (Fitz followed by Corbett) a fairly logical sucession. Given Corbetts recent inactivity he would have needed a significant period to get himself ready for a title fight.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    Thanks for the info.
    There was a 16 months gap between the Corbett and Griffin fights,is this what you are referring to?
    After Sharkey ,Jeffries was back in the ring within 4 months to fight Finnegan.
     
  9. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
     
  10. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Got those from cyberboxingzone. Guess there are some newspaper reports around.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,589
    27,253
    Feb 15, 2006
    I am gonig to speculate about where Jeffries opponents might have been ranked had rankings existed back then.

    At the time that Jeffries wins the title from Bob Fitzsimmons, Tom Sharkey is on a winning streak that includes Gus Ruhlin, Jim Corbett and Kid McCoy. He is clearly going to be seen as the standout challenger. McCoy is also on a winning streak.

    Tom Sharkey
    Sharkey would be ranked either #1 or #2 depending on whether Bob Fitzsimmons was granted the #1 slot by virtue of being the defeated champion.

    Jim Corbett
    Would certainly fall beneath Fitzsimmons and Sharkey in the rankings on the grounds that both had beaten him. He might have slipped bellow McCoy also, though he would have been seen as a better scalp. He would probably have been ranked between #3 and #5.

    Griffin and Kennedy
    After the Corbett fight, Jeffries was out of action for 18 month recovering from an injury. He took two warm up fights against Hank Griffin and Joe Kennedy. Joe Kennedy had a win over Fred Russel and a draw against Frank Childs going into this fight, after which he fought three draws with Hank Griffin. It is possible that one or both of them could have been ranked in the trailing reaches of the top 10, but it is also possible that they would not.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    Where do you rate Finnegan?
     
  13. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    45
    Nov 18, 2010
    Jim Jeffries, would he be considered one of the Top 10 heavyweights, if he didn't come back against Jack Johnson.

    How many of his fights would he have lost, if the bouts were scheduled for 15 rounds.
     
  14. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    How many fights would Tyson have lost if the bouts were scheduled for 40 rounds?
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    I don't let Jeffries comeback fight influence where I rank him .
    As to Jeffries in 15 rounders,well he would have to be a lot more assertive in his tactics and force the pace more.
    He would not be able to rely on wearing his man down over the protracted distance.
    Maybe he could ,maybe he couldnt. I would say that the longer fights suited him better though.
    How many would he have lost if he had been facing, younger ,active opponents in Fitz and Corbett might be a more pointed question?