jim lampley owned when trying to argue 7th round

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by boxingfan1991, Jun 17, 2012.


  1. boxingfan1991

    boxingfan1991 Active Member Full Member

    768
    0
    Apr 1, 2012
    lampley tried to use round 7 as an reason on y the judging was wrong but when they played round 7 which jim had it for pacquio it turned out bradley was winning that round
     
  2. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    I thought the same thing... Bradley was working PAC's body nicely that round.
    Plus the PACman is lucky the reffere didn't deduct a point for pushing down.
     
  3. boxingfan1991

    boxingfan1991 Active Member Full Member

    768
    0
    Apr 1, 2012
    yeah bradley was putting in that work on round 7
     
  4. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
    the commentary was horrible
     
  5. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
    my pops missed the fight last week so i told him to watch it last night. he was shocked at how biased the commentators and Leddermans card was. it was a close fight no doubt.
     
  6. barrera

    barrera Guest

    Rofl typical HBO bias
     
  7. boxingfan1991

    boxingfan1991 Active Member Full Member

    768
    0
    Apr 1, 2012

    jim talks to muchh and he is always lateeee like a brawl would happen and he would announce it 10 or 20 sec after it happen as it was happening at that moment
     
  8. boxingfan1991

    boxingfan1991 Active Member Full Member

    768
    0
    Apr 1, 2012
    ledderman was way off but its crazy cuz i was watching it at a bar and most of the people there are not big boxingfans they just watch the big fights only that are on ppv so when the decision came they said butt ledderman hat it 10-2 for pacquiao they thought he was a real judge of the fight
     
  9. dodong

    dodong >>PACQUIAO Full Member

    28,160
    32
    Apr 14, 2007
    take away those punches to the arms and gloves by bradley then you can see why it was a clear round for pac.
     
  10. boxingfan1991

    boxingfan1991 Active Member Full Member

    768
    0
    Apr 1, 2012

    so when pac was missing like crazy and holding i guess they still count to u
     
  11. thawk888

    thawk888 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,967
    5
    Sep 16, 2011
    You didn't know Pac just breathing on Bradley was an automatic 10-8 round for Manny?
     
  12. boxingfan1991

    boxingfan1991 Active Member Full Member

    768
    0
    Apr 1, 2012
    damn i almost forgot about that
     
  13. Hatesrats

    Hatesrats "I'm NOT Suprised..." Full Member

    60,376
    241
    Sep 28, 2007
    Bradley landed a nice hook against the ropes that he wasn't given credit for either.
     
  14. boxingfan1991

    boxingfan1991 Active Member Full Member

    768
    0
    Apr 1, 2012
    u know back in the day showtime was the big guys but hopefully that will change maybe that canelo vs ortiz will make boxing fans again interest in showtime promoting boxing
     
  15. Berossus

    Berossus New Member Full Member

    84
    0
    May 30, 2012
    Was he really that stupid? Sounded to me like he was critiquing the punch stats but not for Manny