jim lampley owned when trying to argue 7th round

Didn't you get taught simple grammar or spelling as a child?

edit: remember your capital letters, your commas and your full stops...

 

This content is protected

Them dang pundits

 

Nah, close but pac won those. Lampley showed the 7th to protect the NSAC

 

I gave Bradley rounds 1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 11 and 12.

3, 6 and 7 could go either way and were, IMO, the deciding rounds.

I've also seen people argue rounds 8 and 9 for Bradley, yet that's people who had him losing.

In reality, it was no robbery or even bad decision. It was a close fight and I'd have been happy with either decision.

 

7, 10, and 12 is all I could give Bradley, especially if you are scoring pro style as apposed to amateur and the fact that Bradley was hurt on various occasions gives further credence to that

 

Not necessarily.

As others have posited, he might have picked round seven on purpose, to protect Arum (who's basically paying everyone's salary here) and the Vegas commission:

Lampley gets to rail about bad commentary, making him look like a good guy, but then purposely shows a round that makes everyone say, "Gee, I guess Bradley really won, after all."

 

Even the people denying it was close you can tell by their speech these days after seein the fight again or perhaps for the 1st time cus I aint so sure some on the robbery wagon even saw the fight until it re aired anyways you can tell though that their speech is a bit different they know it was close but now after making an ass out of themselves they have to save face..

 

this.

 

Nonsense, I just watched the fight a second time, with the sound off, and found that I had wasted my time doing so.

I had originally given the second round to Pac; after rewatching I still felt like Pac won it, but I thought it was a fairly close round. That is the only thing that changed for me. It was pretty clear that Pacquiao won, at the very least, eight rounds. The other four could be argued to be Bradley rounds, but he didn't win any of them clearly.

The detractors all have ulterior motives; they all hate Pac, love Bradley or wanted Pac to lose for some other reason. Either that or they are scoring things that shouldn't be scored (arms punches and missing). The fact that there are as many dissenting voices as there are here only goes to show how silly, and lacking in knowledge, the majority of ESB posters are.

 

Agreed. Lampley was a ****ing MORON to use RD 7. That round was clearly Bradley's. The judges got that round right. With the sound off and the commentary bias eliminated, it's clear to see how Lamps used the wrong round to prove his point.


Nevertheless, I still think Pac clearly won the fight. He got shafted out of a win.

 

This.

Although his jab was hitting glove most of the round, I'd still give this round to Bradley but the problem was finding him 6 more.

 

No it wasnt the problem is watching whats going on during the rounds, first three rounds I gave to Tim the 7th I also gave to Tim the last three I gave to Tim
Rewatching it the fourth could easily be Tims