Jim Watts's commentary was so biased on Sky....

Your a mug mate

Take it your a friend of the family or something?

 

Great assessment - end thread

 

Are you ignoring all the sickening bone-crunching rights on the face by Groves in round 3? Froch was aggressive but hardly connected.

In the fifth he did find his target some, but go back and review it but without focusing in on the work of Froch or placing his work into perspective compared with the preceding rounds. Just strictly look at the quality and quantity of his work compared to Groves'. No way Froch got the fifth, and the fifth was the closest until the eighth.

 

Have you ever set foot in a boxing ring ?
Flush punches dont sound sickening, but cuffing punches, and glove on glove do sound like Rocky movie sound effects though.
This place gets ****in worse, even the British board has gone to ****.

 

So Froch fell short with his jab, hardly landed a meaningfull shot all night, and in the final exchange didn't really land cleanly enough to put GRoves in any sort of trouble ?
So please explain to me why Groves has a face like John ****in Merrick ?

 

He fell short with most of his jabs in the first seven, although some did get through (just nowhere remotely near enough to swing those his way against Groves' output, landing more shots and of a better sort) and did the bulk of the damage on Groves' face in the eighth and ninth with the clubbing right.

 

Jim Watt is a two faced pratt, i can stand listening to him, he swings this way and that way his views on fights are about as useful as chopsticks and soup, and while we are at it get Glen "on the fence" mccrory off as well. He's fekin pointless lines grind me up,. Get Richie W in there, stevie collins and Mcguigan job done...

 

From the comments from other fighters and commentary it does seem like all of Great Britain wanted Groves to win. Who could blame them?

 

Pork miso soup is actually eaten with chopsticks, so HOW DUMB ARE YOU FEELING?! :nutcase

 

Groves turned away from the action because the referee was on top of him as soon as the exchange with Froch ended.

 

Jim Watt had Valouev beating Haye. Watt said that Haye could not win a fight without throwing punches........................Haye just ran like Hell, but everyone was surprised when two of Don King's judges gave the fight to Haye, a split decision. Was a joke.........

 

Froch was robbed of the ko. I don't see why groves got robbed. Clearly groves was there to be ko. Jim watt is a **** bored of him now on sky

 

Sometimes I have an issue with the commentators but they were spot on for this fight maybe your the real idiot who needs to get his head out of frochs *******!!

 

I know the difference *****

Bit like when mayweather hits opponents flush on the face

Froch was the one landing cuffing punches

 

Georges jab was better than Frochs.