Jim Watts's commentary was so biased on Sky....

Here is the full fight http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F8qon7UC_A0

Time stamp the sickening bonecrunching rights in the 3rd please

 

I agree. Sky's agenda was disgracefully obvious. Some of the most one-sided commentary I've ever seen.

 

I never used to mind Watt but he got right on my nerves in this fight, he just repeated the same thing over and over. "But Froch is sooooo slooooooooooow, there's noooo confidence in anything he does...oh lovely shot by Grooooves"

 

Get back into bed with your sister, and stop posting shite on here. :good

 

I can't wait to see the reply. :good

 

Lol you might want to watch the fight b4 you comment. Utterly exhausted? Jelly legs? Being punch at will? ... your talking about Frotch right?

 

froch wasn't on jelly legs, but he was sure getting very frustrated and he was shaken several times. That just tells us the calibre of the fight was world level.


this is a world title fight, its supposed to be a test, so its no biggie that he was pushed to the limit and beyond. no one wants to see tocker pudwill 2 back in the days of Calslappy and Turnip Ottke.

 

Well, thats me told then!!. forgot totally about the pork miso soup!!, i was thinking more heinz based to be fair.

 

I thought he was right about Frochs jab,he said Froch was "pawing"with it.Anyway,it WAS Groves who was winning most rds as Jim Watt and you just said so WTF you on about? Froch couldn`t do **** for much of the fight.How the heck was he biased? Although he did go on about Frochs lack of confidence too much.

 

You didn't answer my question.
How can you be robbed when there still is 3 and a half rounds to go?