Jimmy Young was an excellent fighter

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cross_trainer, Aug 11, 2009.


  1. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    Just the same, Young's performances against Lyle, Foreman, Shavers, Norton, and Ali are not those of a typical 34-19-2 fighter. TBooze said earlier that "Jimmy Young was 34-19-2 for a reason". I doubt that that reason had much to do with his abilities at his peak.

    That was my point in bringing up Walcott (I could have used any number of non-starving top contenders during the 40's and 50's, come to think of it, but Walcott was the first who came to mind). Record does not equal ability at one's peak.
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,223
    27,728
    Jan 3, 2007
    That was a cracking post...:lol::lol::lol::lol:

    Pow - Poom - Ping :!:
     
  3. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,737
    3,428
    Feb 17, 2008
    For a guy with supposedly zero power, Young threw a real real nice straight sneaky right hand in that 75-77 timeframe. And it had an affect on the guys he hit with it for some reason, which doesn't really figure. It wasn't as if the guy had a nasty follow up left hook or uppercut or anything to be concerned with as far as a follow up combo is concerned. Just that solitary quick right hand.

    Lyle was a tough hombre and would pause and re-set himself after Young landed it. It not only got his attention, it caused a reaction that Lyle just didn't do all that often. Same with the
    Foreman fight. That straight right stopped a lot of that Foreman aggression and Big George just didn't wing away with those 2/3/4 follow up tough shots he used to throw against guys.

    That straight right hand had Ali trying to go toe to toe after he got hit and that was something he only did when he was usually going in for the kill. He rarely went for instantaneous payback. But he'd eat one of them against Young and he reacted differently to getting hit clean than his usual tactic of going into a defensive mode for a few seconds and prevent follow ups. That right didn't exactly stop Norton in his tracks but you could visibly see the effect of it on Kenny. And Kenny did get shook up in there a few times, probably more than he ever was against Ali oddly enough.

    Young would land that sneaky punch and it always seemed to get the opponent to respect it and not walk through it like you'd think. Not those caliber opponents. And then Young would get opponents to fall for feints. It was definetely an offensive skill in there but strangley enough it was hardly the type that'd cause a knockdown or even cause a cut.
     
  4. leverage

    leverage Active Member Full Member

    1,372
    16
    Dec 27, 2006
    young was an excellent fighter in terms of ability. I feel that he deserved the decision against norton and technically beat ali (even though ali didn't train for that fight, which wasn't youngs fault). He just didn't seem motivated or dedicated enough to reach the top and it's a shame because he could've accomplished much more than he did.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    And you are running true to form .

    Never answering a critical post.


    You understood my post allright ,but you bottled it.


    Did you like my jibe about you not checking your facts before posting?


    Are these sentences far enough apart for you , my myopic friend?

    Russell Young ? :think I like the sound of that. :good

    "You can run ,but you can't hide"------------ Joe Louis.

    9 , 10 , your'e OUT ! :lol:
     
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    Pithy, but fair, and accurate I would say regarding his attitude.
     
  7. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,179
    Oct 22, 2006
    Young had ability and sometimes he showed it, but too often he just showed up and blew any momentum.

    If he was as hard done by as you suggest, people (particularly in a popular era and division), would of given his career a lift.

    The truth was, Young was a fair fighter, who's style was never going to make him popular, and was so inconsistent, that rightly he lost in 50/50 type decisions.

    That is Young's problem, not boxing's, Young could of been so much more if he had put the effort in that a Ali, Frazier or Norton did.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    Thanks Mr M :good
    My post might have been cramped ,but it was legible ,and,I think ,honest.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    You are re-writing history,I lived the era
    .Saw the fights as they happened
    Suck eggs. Heard the expression?
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    Young could not beat a 37 year old Norton ,or a 35 year old Ali ,because he did not have the COJONES TO GO FOR IT!
    ps .There is no e in Muhammad and no space bar needed to correct you.

    In the words of George Plimpton ,[check him out]," You had to be there"
     
  11. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    I'm not sure that there's an accepted Romanization from Arabic, is there?

    (Although I guess as an American, whatever form Muhammad Ali chose was the "correct" one as far as his own name's concerned).
     
  12. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    We may be straying a bit from the main point, though:

    Regardless of how frustrating and boring Young is, can we agree that he's either the best or tied for the best fighter in the world (based on performances) during the time frame I mentioned?
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    Muhammad would be of aramaic,or cyrillic origin? No?
    I was just pulling Russell's chain, a little ,we all make typos, me espiciaaaaly:yep
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,716
    30,652
    Jun 2, 2006
    Young beat dangerous fighters like Jeff Sims,nobodies idea of an easy nights work,the guy had real ability,but he squandered it, imo.
    I watched him make a fool of British Champ John l Gardner, dropping him along the way to an effortless dec. Young looked bored by the fact that it was so easy.
    At some stage, you have to say, "the buck stops here".


    Young just . DID NOT WANT IT ENOUGH.
     
  15. cross_trainer

    cross_trainer Liston was good, but no "Tire Iron" Jones Full Member

    12,906
    6,253
    Jun 30, 2005
    Well, I suspect that it's the Classical Arabic version that Ali was shooting for. The script is Aramaic in origin, although I think the language itself has its roots farther back when whatever it's descended from split off from proto-Semitic.

    Of course, an easy way to settle all of this is to point out that the infallible boxrec people write it as Muhammad. :yep