Why in the hell did the judges have the scores so lopsided for Toney? I can understand giving Toney the decision because of the low blow point deduction and knockdown, but **** like 117-109? COME ON! atsch Jirov was the one constantly applying the pressure and threw more punches. Including some HEAVY body shots. With the point deduction I will agree Toney won ...but it was close. Those two should have rematched
Go **** yourself dip****. I already agreed Toney won but it was a lot closer than it was made out to be on the cards.
what's the problem then? shut the fuk up. you're moaning about a fight that happened 8 years ago. instead of appreciating it for the great battle that it was, you come on here bitching about the cards. get the fuk outta here you ******.
The TS is absolutely right, something wasn't right with the judges. Toney won a clear but close decision that night, so the right guy won, but the judges were probably looking too much at the ring girls. Great fight, tough. Jirov was a really good fighter and Toney's work in the pocket is always something to see.
Get the **** outta my thread if you don't like it dumbass. I'm sure a lot of people agree with me that it was a closer fight than made out to be :good **** off stupid ass
Exactly :good Should have been a rematch between the two. Maybe a 116-114 score or something like that would have been a little more realistic.
ok little child. who says it wasn't a close fight? did you watch the fight for the first time today or something? the concensus is that Toney did the far cleaner work. it doesn't matter how many punches Jirov was throwing, he was getting countered to hell and back.
Little child ...this coming from somebody that bust out with "Toney clearly won you ******." ****in idiot. Toney ate some good counters too. And was being pressured and attacked with strong body work and good shots to the head. And yeah today was the first time I watched this fight all the way through. AND? :roll: Again ...Toney won but it was close. If you don't like that opinion or this thread ...too ****in bad :yep
Lol!! must have hit a nerve. look at this fool spazzing out. you watched the fight for the first time today. you can't have been following the sport for more than a few months. fuk off.
when rounds are close its entirely possible for scores to be wide judge A could score the close rds one way and judge B another this is why there is 3 of them this is also why its a non issue