JJW vs. Billy Conn

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by KuRuPT, Apr 9, 2015.


  1. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,462
    2,814
    Aug 26, 2011
    Billy Conn challenges JJW for the HW title just as he did Louis. Both at their best.. Who wins?
     
  2. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    8,874
    Oct 8, 2013
    Conn's best was probably lost to the war. Stylistically I like Walcott in this match up.
     
  3. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    I think Walcott edges him (post WW2). Joe was too shifty and tricky, and also too dangerous a puncher. He had a tricky, again...shifty is the word...rhythm...and was less predictable than Louis, for example. Prior to the war, maybe it would have been in Billy's favor.
     
  4. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    I saw an absolute prime Joe Walcott ko a young sensational ko artist Tommy Gomez in 1946, and I think that JJW a true heavyweight, should be a favorite over any lightheavyweight in modern times. The rule still applies, that "a great big man beats a great smaller division fighter". So Walcott at his best beats any 175 pounder IMO...
     
  5. Balder

    Balder Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,881
    1,893
    Nov 10, 2012
    JJW, He does better against Conn than Louis did.
     
  6. kingfisher3

    kingfisher3 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,448
    1,824
    Sep 9, 2011
    same, louis was at a style disadvantage v conn, walcott is the opposite, probably more advantaged than louis was disadvantaged tbh.
     
  7. AREA 53

    AREA 53 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,466
    83
    Apr 10, 2006
    Bloody Hell, i must of Over Done It - JJW - My First Thought was
    James J Woody !!