JMM, MAB, Morales, Pac...rank who you think is the best fighter.

How do you think JMM VS Hamed would have panned out?:think

 

Hey, Barrera was already shot (at 29) when he first fought Pac, it's just that he was the feather king at that time and that after TKO to Pac, he went on to win his next 6 or 5 fights and won a superfeather belt in the process. He was a SHOT fighter at that time why can't people here accept the obvious? He was SHOT! WHAT A SHOT!!!

 

Certainly, Pac didn't help JMM beat a prime Casamayor or Barrera. But hey, wasn't Barrera a shot? And the fight, it was very close and in the opinion of many, including me, was won by Barrera.:huh

 

#1 Barrera
#2 Morales
#3 Pacquiao








#4 JMM

 

Morales #1 !!

 

I'll repeat :

Pacman should be # 1 he beat all 3 of them ..

Mab #2 he beat Morales 2 out of 3 times when they were at their best ..I also feel he beat JMM

Morales @ 3 because he is the only to have a legit win over Manny

And JMM well who the hell has he really beat ? So he rds out the bottom ..

 

wait till Divac READS this comment of yours

 

Erik Morales no. 1...

 

This is in good order! Pac is at the tailend cause he is not on the level of these 3 great fighters. He is just so lucky that he defeated all of them! IMHO, Pac is so lucky that if he would fight all of them again and again and again, he would always be the winner.

 

Don't expect mexicans to ever say PAC was better. Wel... some would, but VEEERY few. I'm sure some people voting here are Mexican and would NEVER vote for pac unless he beat margarito or something. And even then they might say margartio was shot/weight drained/never any good. Easily the most biased fans.

 

if you go by statistics. it is irrefutable that pac beat all of these 3 fighters and sent them to the canvas 10x cumulatively.

yet none have come close to knocking the guy out even, the great EM was not able to do that.

and yes, that was a slip in the barrera fight, slow-mo clearly show it was a slip. from those data alone, it would be logically follow that pac would be on top with the three great mexicans in various possible scenarios which will be acceptable in any case.

but a ranking wherein pac is 3rd or 4th is not supported by solid statistical analysis. and would not generate credibility.