JMM, MAB, Morales, Pac...rank who you think is the best fighter.

:happytruth

 

Very subjective comparisons.. This is like comparing Foreman, Ali, Frazier and Holmes.

Quite certain Prime Pac would beat a prime version of Barrera. Part of Barrera's style relies on aggression, and you don't beat Pac with Aggression unless you have a great beard, like Morales.

Barrera and Morales styles pretty much neutralized one another. Results form those fights are pretty screwed up. Reverse the first two decisions, then take into account Morales was already worn by their third fight.

IMO a prime Morales would beat a prime JMM. Prime Morales was a sharp puncher with a great beard. So the counter punching skills of JMM would be effective, but he would be forced to trade due to Morales' style. It could be that JMM could completely neutralize Morales with his style, but I think Morales' offense was quite dynamic in a sense he forced exchanges.

JMM already beat Pac. That Pac refused a rematch is a travesty to boxing. Both fighters are clearly maturing and have limited time for a great matchup. Putting it off just tilts the edge to either fighter.. The longer it is put off, the less important this fight becomes. Much like Jones vs. Hopkins. Its just stupid beyond belief this fight didn't happen YESTERDAY.

Over the hill Morales Beat Pac, Pac beat him. Morales was a great, quality tool but was shop worn to hell.

Morales sits on top

JMM, Pac, Barrera. Pretty much equals.

Barrera should be lower, but his ability to fight Morales to a stand still increases his value. Pac could very well be the top dog, but he won't take on meaningful fights.

I'm happy as hell he beat Oscars ass. Part of me is glad he did it, but the clock is ticking for the re-match with JMM. It's a true shame, the boxing Gods are crying this fight couldn't happen at the same weight..

Pac wants to sit on top of my list, he needs to beat JMM convincingly.

 

Biggest idiot ever. You always laugh at your own jokes. You must be asian and a ***. Prime Morales beats Paq 10 out of 10 times they fight. You neec to watch boxing that took place before 2004. Until then keep your **** nuthugging *** opinion to yourself. You're a ****ing joke.

 

barrera
marquez
morales
pacquiao

big fan of them all

 

Pac
MAB
EM
JMM

 

Morales
Barrera
Marquez
Pacquiao

 

Pac beat all 3 he should be at number 1 imo.

2 should goto Mab I had him beating Jmm and he beat Morales 2 out 3 fights Morales comes next his win over Manny elevates him over JMM who imo has yet to beat Manny . This is how I look at it we can agree or disagree but I too am a fan of all of them .

 

1. Pacquiao
2. Barrera
3. Morales
4. Marquez

2, 3, and 4 are close as hell though.

 

if your scoring through records against easch other then it should be 1.pac 2.morales. 3.barrera 4.marquez

if your scoring through skill. 1.morales 2.marquez 3.pacquiao 4.barrera. however the better skills dont mean you are a better boxer i.e the records against each other

 

Pacquiao
Marquez
Barerra
Morales
Based on talent because you said who's the best fighter

achievement
1 Pacquiao
2 Morales
3 Barerra
4 Marquez

 

You know ****

 

the 3 were still top 10 p4p when they met pac and at the top of their division. They are the best the division can offer at that time. You have to do with whats available.

 

We already saw a prime morales but not a prime pac, so any conclusion with this prime for prime thing is nonsense you racist piece of ****

 

Pac has to be #1

Then:
MAB
Morales
JMM

 

pac
em
mab
jmm