JMM Rank Above pacquiao By Beating Bradley?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Slickstar, May 1, 2013.


  1. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,760
    3,974
    May 4, 2012
    But what high level fights did he have at 154? :think
     
  2. MAG1965

    MAG1965 Loyal Member banned

    34,796
    66
    Dec 1, 2008
    You want me to say he fought at 154 so he say he didn't, but let us say he fought good 154 pound fighters like Mosley and Delahoya, Cotto and Margarito. Guys who fought at 154 and fought well, regardless of catchweights which I have never been in favor of. Cannot get much better than that as far as competition, and how would JMM have done against those two regardless of a catchweights? Not too well. Manny fought guys who JMM never would have fought, which is why a fight between Manny and Floyd would have been more competitive than JMM vs. Floyd. Manny had faster hands which made it so that he could handle the bigger guys. It wasn't that Manny was bigger, it was that Manny had more skills and speed. I still think he would have lost to Floyd. But Floyd never wanted to fight him. But that is why I mentioned fighting bigger guys. Manny proved more, same as I think Hearns proved more than Leonard in terms of fighting bigger guys, but that discussion is a whole new thread. I think in Hearns case his more success at the higher weights brought him closer to Ray in terms of ATG, as well as other wins.
     
  3. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,760
    3,974
    May 4, 2012
    No one knows if Marquez could beat them or not. Could he have beaten Clottey or the shell of a Delahoya? Why the hell not? I love how you say Marquez would never fight the guys Manny did....yet Marquez fought a guy that Manny wouldn't.

    He didn't have any high level bouts at 154, no need to try and make things up.
     
  4. Bee KeepZ

    Bee KeepZ Roid City Full Member

    3,466
    1
    Nov 13, 2009
  5. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,760
    3,974
    May 4, 2012
    Stop.
     
  6. Bee KeepZ

    Bee KeepZ Roid City Full Member

    3,466
    1
    Nov 13, 2009
    Flyweight to Welterweight

    Nuff said
     
  7. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    42,760
    3,974
    May 4, 2012
    Too many KTFO losses at Fly.
     
  8. Bee KeepZ

    Bee KeepZ Roid City Full Member

    3,466
    1
    Nov 13, 2009
    4 time lineal champ.
     
  9. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,337
    641
    Jun 16, 2006
    PAC is worse than Lance Armstrong. At least Armstrong took the test.
     
  10. SouthpawJab

    SouthpawJab On his way up!! 4-0!! Full Member

    8,781
    20
    May 26, 2011
    Before he got to 140, he was the bigger man in every fight. A Chavez Jr level drainer.
     
  11. Jquik

    Jquik Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,504
    0
    Mar 31, 2013
    I hate people who try and discredit Mannys accomplishments,ok you don't like him,you don't like his fans but you are an absolute mong if you can't apreciate what he has done in the sport of boxing.

    Even though im a huge Marquez fan hel be long forgotten before Manny Pacqauio ever will.
     
  12. rodney

    rodney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,337
    641
    Jun 16, 2006
    jMM just knocked that Juicehead off the ladder. Even Lance Armstrong didn't refuse the test. PAC should not even be on the list.
     
  13. Cellz A G

    Cellz A G Guest

    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    120-107

    :hi:

    This content is protected
     
  14. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,382
    1,136
    Oct 17, 2009
    Who let MAIN's ***** ass back on? :lol: Go ahead post away before your next ban.
     
  15. Cellz A G

    Cellz A G Guest

    ******

    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    120-107

    :hi:

    This content is protected