JMM said his 4 losses were all robberies..

Divac can attest to that . . . and swear to high heavens.

:hey

JMM is Divac ????

 

All his losses were pretty close and could of been his wins w/o too much flack.

 

the ***** is bitchin as always. The ***** is a good boxer though.

 

Maybe he didn't lose those fights but certainly his opponents won!atsch

 

His first fight with Pac was officially a draw, shouls had been a SD win for Pac if not for the scoring error by one of the judges, so it was a robbery but to JMM's favor. Their second fight was a tie at 6 rds a piece but Pac clinched the win with a KD in the 3rd rd. It could had been 7-5 for JMM because he was winning the 3rd rd before that fateful KD. It was a robbery indeed, Pac robbed him of the victory thru a single KD.

 

jmm sure has a way of puckering up his lips whenever he makes this poses of him. the thing is, if jmm files a complaint and commits perjury on the process, (lying under oath), under some jurisdiction that can land you in jail.

and if jmm lands in jail, he will be raped more. but if he consents to a long line of black dudes, then there will be no **** since consent is an element for the crime of ****.

as for divac, the well known jmm fanboy, he can argue till his voice turns raspy but these are the indisputable facts in the saga that is pac vs. jmm.

1. first fight. 3 kd + scoring error= draw.
2. second fight. 1 kd+ 1 chickendance= split decision in favor of pac.

these are the irrefutable facts, based on empirical evidence or evidence beyond reasonable doubt. :yep

as for the "jmm schooled pac for 11 rounds" and "jmm schooled pac in the 2nd fight", these are mere assertions, conjenctures, debatable points at best. subject to the scoring of the judges.

given the factual millieu, it can be said that it was pac who was robbed in the first fight and fittingly won the second fight.

i rest my case your honor.

 

...plus the ref missed what was a 2nd knockdown in rd 3.

 

Both pacquiao fight could've gone either way. The John fight, on the other hand, was not a robbery, imo - although the scores should've been closer. Remember, Marquez was deducted a total of two points for repeated low blows in the later rounds.

Very nice Avatar. :good

 

harrison!

as long as divac does not like the RESULTS it's going to be called




















































ROBBERY!

 

No, but divac's blood pressure, heart beart, thoughts, desires, dreams is the same as JMM!

 

When JMM bitches like this i forget how talented a boxer she is.

 

regardless if we think he was robbed or not the fact is, the man's never been decisively beaten, and that includes his fight with Pacman

 

decisively beaten or not,fact is he was beaten.move on already JMM.

 

JMM is a crying sore loser, great fighter though. But same as his fans also cries with him:|:|

i have never seen spinks or any other fighters who are victim of MORE highway robberies and their fans ***** about their loses like forever, its only jmm who does

did whitaker or his fans cried and cried for months when he got robbed by chavez nor did robin reid or any of his fans cried for a long time about the ottke robbery?

up to now i keep seeing all this jmm was robbed **** till now and those fights were waaaaay too long ago and not really highway robberies as he claims