JMM v Diaz or Pac Man v Hatton; which win do you rate higher?

ooopps......sorry

 

Who is exactly not tailor-made for Pac today? Hoya was tailor made, Diaz was tailor-made, Hatton was tailor made, MAB was, Ledwaba was, so is EM ibn 2nd and 3rd fight. With so many good (not bums) fighters tailor-made for him, he could probably set-up a tailor shop, or change his monicker to the Tailor.

Regardless of the style of the fighter, you still have to execute the plan, which differentiates elite fighters from so so fighters. On paper, Juan is tailor-made for JMM as well. Juan just tries to outmuscle and outpunch you, and his defense is massive offensive output that the opponent just ends up covering like Freitas. But those punches has no power, which bodes well with JMM who is a good coouterpuncher. Besides he does not need to find Juan because Juan will be in his face all the time.. Mayweather on the other hand us different because he does not like in-clo=se fighting and a counterpuncher as well.

 

NOt even close...

 

Pacquiao the Tailor Man? :rofl:rofl

 

No disrepect to Manny but Hatton fought so stupidly. Hatton is the bigger name but the fight did not look impressive. Pac made Hatton look like an amateur.

 

And who else made hatton looks like a pathetic amateur? Funny last time i check Hatton was a long-time, undefeated reigning champ of 140 div. and a titlist at 147. While Diaz, how long did he rule 135? Had a close fight with PM, while PM was dominated by Hatton.

Smacks double standards for me. CLEARLY.

 

JMM against Diaz...this win has been proven to be great considering wat happened on Saturday nite....The only way that JMM cud win this fite realisticallt was to KO Diaz and he did it
Pac and Hatton well hatton was sloppy he used the same tatics he did against mayweather, he also fought like he didnt no that Pac was a southpaw...the win was easier than alot of people expected....even Freddie Roache said it would be over inside three rounds he knew that this would be a straightforward win

 

People who voted the first and third option still don't want to go back to reality.

It's not even close.

 

definitely PAC.. marquez struggled against diaz and diaz struggled to malignaggi and malignaggi struggled against hatton..

PAC IS THE MAN.

 

atsch:nutwhat does malignaggi have to do with any of this :rofl

 

Hatton despite all the flaws were only beaten by 2 people. Both #1 P4P'er. What if's dont mean anything. If Pac had the ring generalship of Calderon....

A fight may look good impressive given that certain fighters' style compliment each other. JMM's win was great, but to make Hatton look like a " simple, defenseless, mindless boxer, etc.." yet ruled the division is a more impressive feat.

 

Now thats impressive!

 

Ricky was already on the slide, as for Diaz, he was winning, then, "BOOM!" Game over.

 

So which win is more impressive??

Is it the fight where the B- fighter is not even supposed to be "winning" prior to the KO or the on the "slide" fighter who basicaly slid into oblivion without much resistance.

That is a very big dilemna for you my friend. Luckily, I do not have to be judgmental and take their wins as is, without malice and prejudice. JMM win was great and so is Pac's win. As to who had the greater win, let history judge it.

 

damn!... a nail to the head! :happy

if anything jmm's difficulty in handling diaz who is nowhere his level is a minus, not a plus. a lot of jmm fans are so into his drama they should be watching feminine 3pm soap shows instead of boxing.