JMM VS HATTON - Who is better pound for pound?

Juan Manuel Marquez of course, much better boxer and is currently 1-0-1 against top 10 pound for pounders.

Why do people keep forgetting he was robbed?:-(

 

Hattons win over Tszyu was the dirtiest in boxing history..everyone outside of Manchester knows this...Finally Ricky Hatton was forced to fight and not wrestle..and was exposed..I'm just glad Floyd punished him for his lack of skill and intelligence..and made him look like a clown in the process

 

Collazo clowned Ricky and easily won that fight:good

 

Hatton

 

Sorry mate just a bit ****ed up..just got back from the pub:good Hash and rum mates makes for a great nite out:good

 

JMM, and it's not really close

 

Coming from the mouth of a Pacman Fanatic you can't possibly be taken seriously.

JMM was robbed, end of story. CJ may be a good fighter, but he is not on the level of JMM and you should at least agree with that.

 

I had Hatton up by a round, so even if though its fair enough to say Collazo won (close fight) no one 'easily' won that fight, it was far too grueling to be called easy.

Btw I cant believe that some people are voting for Hatton, he's good but not in JMM's class! (I believe he beat Pac)

 

No, I would say that accolade goes to Joe Calzaghe.

 

defo marquez.....

 

well saying joe is welsh,doesnt really count.
yes he was born in england but try calling him english.

 

RH is 1-1 with top 10 p4ps,he was always the underdog and fought the best p4p in the world,his wins over maussa,magee,tszyu,castillo,collazo and urango rank higher than anything JMM has achieved so Hatton has to be higher p4p.

and would people please shut the **** up about witter,who the **** has he fought!

 

and coming from a "anypacopponent dick rider" like you
jmm was whooped plain and simple by chris john.
get over it :good :good