JMM vs. Pac II: Respected columnist Dan Rafael's take

I guess you were not a true boxing fan right after the first fight?

 

the end of the week could not come any sooner for you buddy, but not bad you made a name for yourself in less than 300 posts

 

It was close because of the 10-8 round. JMM schooled him. I don't even like JMM so I am not being blinded by favorism. How did Paq win this fight?? The KD should not have been enough. Specially when he was being tagged by beautiful punches coming from crazy ****ing angles. JMM deserved this one. Paq knew he lost. He kept smiling at the camera like I am okay but **** he was being taught a boxing lesson.

 

I can explain that..JMM holding himself up with the ropes aid..

 

Still wating for my humble pie but for some reason no one seems to be passing the plate:hi:

 

I find it funny how they say that they had the score 114-113 for marquez(same as mine but it could have gone either way if i give that particular close round to pac), yet they seem to feel that there was a fix, a robbery and that they are killing boxing for it. Really funny:yep having it scored 114-113 and calling it robbery:rofl

 

You have to read what i quoted, i quoted the words of what schaefer said and not yours:nono

 

Anyway no one yet answered the question..

now does a score of 114-113 look fixed?

 

Trust me, I read your post! Nowhere in Schaefer's quote does the word

This content is protected

come up, tha't why I accused you of twisting his words.

Here's the quote again:

Schaefer: “I find it hard to believe that a judge was changed in the week leading up to the fight. That same judge scored the fight 114-113 for Pacquiao. There is no fight fan in the world that doesn’t want to see this again. We can all agree that there was controversy.”:deal

 

Im curious whats your opinion of In jin Chi

I think he was an overrated overachiever that was schooled by Morales and his fans are making the fight closer than it really was.

 

thank you..

 

I agree with you on your assesment of CHI, and the reason his fans feel that way is because Morales was supposed to have had any easy victory here but CHI proved himself very tenacious and made Erik work for his victory.

And I know where you're trying to go with this but it doesn't fly because in this case (JMM/PAC2) It's not only Marquez fans who felt he won, so did most of the viewing public and as you very well know, even some of your fellow PACfans, which is pretty unprecedented around here:deal

 

Well what i meant there was the word controversy, he made it sound like the judge was fix to score a 114-113 fight where a lot of people have the score of 114-113 for either guy. 114-113 was the real score and no way 114-113 is ****ing controversy or robbery.

 

IMO, he was insinuating that some of the judging, this one in particular because of the circumstances, may have been biased in favor of Manny!


Any way, with that I'm out for a month of R & R!


PAC and JMM put on a great fight, let's hope they finish with a historic trilogy, I wish the best to both of them.


And no offense meant nor taken to anyone here, it's all been in fun.


Later:thumbsup

 

You should of told me it was you dude, i would of let everything slide.

But come on you yourself has been saying for years, all Dinamita needs is another 12 rounds to pickup from the first fight and school Pacman without the huge 1st round lead. There was no schooling, and much like the 1st fight it was competitive for the entire fight.