JMM's counter-punching useless against Floyd, but effective against Pacquiao. LOOK!

you do too much talking..pac is different now compared when he lost to morales...

just wait until pac kick the ass of ****** sr and chicken jr

 

Nah....you are comparing apples to oranges. JMM was faster, fresher and at his proper weight with PAC.

We could do the same thing with comparing DLH fighting with FLoyd vs his fight with PAC. PAC demolished DLH and Floyd had a struggle. Apples to oranges.

 

Counterpunching of Marquez is not effective to defeat Floyd a better counterpuncher. But leftie Pac will give Floyd problems all night.

 

lol....Floyd defintely had his hands full with DLH. He lost rounds which isn't noramlly the case for Floyd. He only looses round when he steps up his comp, like with JLC, DLH, Hatton and Zab. Other than that he opens up and shows what he's capable of. When he's at risk he fight ultra conservative, which is why I'm not sure why he didn't take JMM out last Sat.

Yea...it was a clear win over DLH but it was very close and competitve. It was like PAC beating JMM. Close competitve fight but PAC clearly won by a couple of rounds...which was the case for DLH vs Floyd.

If you think PAC looses to Mayweather "easier" than his outing with JMM then hey.....you have your opinion. But the logic won't be there if you try to explain yourself b/c PAC was able to move up in weight effectively, carrying his speed, power and reflexes. JMM clearly did not.

PAC dominated Hatton and DLH. Floyd struggled with both and it took him far longer to get Hatton out of there where PAC only needed two rounds.

Not that it means anything b/c PAC and Floyd are two completely different styles....but that is my reasons to believe that Floyd will have his hands full wth PAC if this fight happens...based on styles. I see Floyd winning a UD but it will be his hardest fight to date without a doubt.

 

you keep on criticizing while pac keeps winning. yeeha!

 

That was a great example to show how much the reach is a huge factor ! Against Pacman, he didn't have that problem + Pacquiao was overly offensive the entire fight.

I truly believe that the Mosley of the year 2000 could and would beat PBF.
That Mosley was a master boxer-puncher.

To beat PBF you need to be at least his size, have at least the same reach, display lots of speed, be active in every round and possess the kind of chin that will allow you to take a punch or 2 in order to establish your combos on the inside..

 

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

:think Ricky took Floyd 10 rounds.....Ricky only lasted 2 against PAC

:think DLH took Floyd the distance......DLH only lasted 8 rounds agasinst PAC. :huh

 

:dealNo major reach disadvantage also.