that's why i said "correct me if i'm wrong". since you're so educated about pac, why don't you educate me about who else has knocked him down. otherwise, it's safe to assume you're just pulling **** out of your ass.
the short answer is, THEY CAN'T DEFEND JMM'S RESUME. so they resort to their usual banter of "we're true boxing fans. *******s are just pac fans and not boxing fans." and if you make points arguing that jmm's resume is ****, they don't pick apart your argument. instead they just say "LOL" followed by a :rofl and then a :deal. then they suck each others cocks and think to themselves "we showed those *******s. *******s owned again!" it's hilarious seeing them do it over and over again.
manny lovers are firce when it come to suckin mannys ****:rofl, "pare" "snell" are hanging from mannys nutsack and they are no letting go, even if manny tried to flick those two fleas off they are holding on with all their might, silly rats, who takes this ignorant parasites seriously anyway?:rofl
actually, i'm holding onto your **** (or *****). but, great one, i, just a humble one, am still waiting for an explanation as to your point regarding your listing of jmm's 3 signature fights against ****/old fighters and pac's 10 or so signature wins against ****/old fighters. i'm really beginning to think that you, my idol, don't have a clue about what you yourself was talking about.
jeff m. jeff m. tsk. tsk. tsk. you disappoint us. just when we thought you haved mended your silly ways and now you revert back to your pac hating ways. there is no use. surrender to the glory of pacmania and you will get yours too when the valero train comes along. for now, don't even think that you have the brain capacity to hang with the bigboys here. you throwing your lot with a 8th grade school teacher. oh, i get it. he is the teacher and you are one of his students. in ohio???
JMM has a good resume. W's against Gainer, Juarez, Barrera, Casa, Diaz, over 3 weight classes and 2 close disputed decisions, 1 a draw the other an L to the best Pound for Pound boxer in the game. Only *******s would make such a ridiculous claim.
He can't decide if he wants to try and impress everyone with a Little bit of knowledge (and you can just tell jeff m wants to impress people more then anything else) or be a troll..which he is as heart. Confused little boy. Better be careful getting to close to his teach, NULLage. :yep
nullage. jeff M. i bet dainty_randy and that exiled P4pdapedo was one of his students also. it makes me wonder how eze is related to nullege.
gainer and juarez are ok wins at best, especially since the hype is that jmm is the consensus p4p #2. the main argument for that stature really are juan diaz (leftovers), and the ancient casamayor and mab. so there is validity in the ts' title.
Do you even know why this thread was made??? If you dont, then STFU and go watch your stupid cartoons....fatboy???:rofl
:rofl. juarez who cannot even beat an ancient mab in 2 tries. garnier who. casa?? ohh, they mean old grandpa casa whom he beat when casa was 37 years old. baby bull. oh, yes that is the one. the one and only.
Both were world champions. And JMM is pound for pound number 2 because he gave Pac the number 1 the toughest fights of his career other then his multiple losses, and his victories over "bigger" guys in Casa and Diaz. Casa coming off a W over Katsidis, and Diaz considered the best lightweight in the world at the time. And they were impressive victories at that.
I can do that with Pac's resume aswell. Diaz who? A shot Hatton and DLH, who was weight drained? See. Easy.