IMO... He gets by with SD/Uds against halfway good competition. Fighters who had sh*tty losing records are mostly the ones he scored (T)KO's...
I don't think he would beat Pacquiao, Marquez, or Barrera, but I think he beats Soto and Valero. Make no mistake, he is one of the best at 130. A match with Jorge Linares would be interesting.
He is not a KO kinda fighter. So this isn't really relevant. Not KOing people doesn't make you overrated.
Arce couldnt even fight Vic D. in his own division, do you really think he was gonna actually fight? So whats your point?
Do you guys realise that we haven't seen the best of Guzman yet? He clowns and toys with opponents far too much, fights their fight even at times when he ought to be wiping them out. I think he'd take a fight with Pac or JMM more seriously. But I'd pick Pac over him this point, I think Joan would defeat JMM though. If anything, he's underrated.
Exactly and he stupidly fought Barrios' fight in the process. 8-4 Guzman would have been an adequate score.
Describing his win over Barrios in the context shows a total lack of objectivity. That win can best be described as a schooling.
Well Arce is an extreme-counter example .. Didn't he admit that his latest whopping was justified b/c of his pre-fight trash talk... LOL what a jerk! Whereas, JG a mild mannered fighter was making a candid call out, which holds a lot weigth IMO. He reminds me of Ricky admitting he wasn't ready for Mayweather after his American premiere.
wow, hold up are we talking about jermain taylor??? because if we are there is no way u could compare guzman to taylor in any way esp. on what has been accomplish so far on both fighters careers....
last time i checked, you can with both by stoppage or points. a win is a win. therfore, guzman is not overrated due to the arguements that you gave. i don't think anyone claims that guzman has one punch ko power in both hands, so no, he is not overrated. your way of thining is flawed