Joan Guzman- Over rated??

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MSTR, May 6, 2008.


  1. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Go ahead and counter that analysis Pharoah, your Pacquaio nuthugging isn't going to allow you to see things clearly of course, but give it a shot. That's right up there with the best analysis' in the sites history.

    I'll be waiting.
     
  2. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    This disqualified stuff is juvenile... Its a great example of people trying to develop some inner clique on ESB that think they can disregard other posters from threads. Give analysis or ignore, but no one on this site is any sort of authority to disregard or remove posters, apart from a moderator.
     
  3. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    I'm a Guzman supporter, but not a nuthugger by any means, if you will see, I rarely even hype him or his fights up and post accordingly. Guzman to me is just a top elite who gets underrated, he's not a Mijares or a Gamboa to me for a variety of reasons.

    I'm a longer fan of JMM, but I'd pick Guzman to beat him.

    I felt his analysis was dead spot on, if you have a reply, I'm sure he'll cover it accordingly. It's hard to bring up counters to select facts and he covered a few of those, some of his mention was not just opinion.
     
  4. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    Disqualification is to remove useless trolls that take away from actual discussion, not to remove posters with adverse opinions, or even posters with absolute stupid opinions. Just trolls that are here to get a rise out of people alone, that would be that poster, I have seen his trash just like that on multiple occassion.
     
  5. the_what

    the_what Bolo Punch KO Full Member

    8,031
    0
    Jul 20, 2004
    Guzman would beat the crap out of both of them.
     
  6. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    I will need to break this into multiple posts so bear with me. First off, JMM and Pac have fought elite level p4p fighters, and have both come out on top. Therefore, they have proven themselves. They have fought fighters on Guzman's level, therefore are currently more highly regarded. Beating fighters more proven and widely acknowledged as being better currently then Guzman is all the proof boxing fans need at this stage. If you choose to ignore common sense, that is your perogative. A ridiculous one IMO. Your whole arguement here is based on your possibly flawed analysis of Guzman. ------ Next, you try and point to ONE particular fight to prove the defence of Marquez being less then sound. Marquez is one of the best technical fighters in the sport. Your comments here are way off the mark. Guzman was getting tagged very cleanly by Soto and also be Barrios FFS. He clearly does not have better defence then Marquez. If you cannot see this, you need to watch some fights without your Guzman glasses on.
     
  7. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    I'll let Huki continue the debate, because I'll just end up getting under MSTR's skin, as usual.
     
  8. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    I didn't say that JMM couldn't counter Pac at any stage, but rather that overall, he couldn't do it effectively. There were a great amount of close rounds, he got knocked down and he also got tagged with hard shots plenty of times. Enough to see that even one of the best counter punchers in boxing did not have the ability to cimply outbox and coutner punch the entire time. Guzman is NOT a counter puncher on this level. He relies heavily on his fast hands and combination punching. Often times simply outgunning his opponents. He certainly isn't a hit and not get hit type counter puncher like Maruqez or Mayweather that is for certain. Guzman has decent footspeed, but not the counter punchign ability to make it effective. Even against a slower guy like Soto, he fought often times in the pockets rather then using his movement. Pac is quicker with both his hands and his feet then Soto, and is also a better offensive fighter. It is silly to think he will not land more frequently then Soto dd, and that being a bigger and more powerful fighter his punches will not have more effect.
     
  9. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    "Pac will only win rounds that Guzman gives away"

    "Guzman's only weakness is his stamina, but it won't be a big problem against Pac"

    "His (Pac's) style is extremely easy to adjust to for Guzman right from the start"

    "More than half of the posters here had JMM winning."
    http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showthread.php?t=52733

    i don't need to discredit his post point by point, just for him to come back and counter-argue point by point.

    Pacquiao is better than Guzman. Their respective fights and careers have demonstrated it. If you over-analyze you can always find your way around the truth.

    You can argue that the sky is green if you're good enough with words, but that doesn't make it so.


    He uses a Jandaeng fight to compare JMM's defence to Guzman's for chrissake. As if JMM really gave a **** about his defence against Jadaeng, where he was beating his ass until the stoppage. Give me a break. what a bunch weak arguments. Alot of words and well posed sentences that make it seem like there is a viable logical reasoning, but there really isn't

    Unfortunately for Huki there are a few clear lapses that outline his overall weak argument.
     
  10. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    Guzman is a brilliant offensive fighter, but so is Pac. Defensively, Guzman is not so good, and neither is Pac. Guzman being the better of the two. Regardless, his defence isn't enough to hold out on a guy like Pac. I'm telling you now, this will more likely then not turn into a war. And Pac is very hard to beat like this. He has good stamina, a decent chin (good enough for Guzman anyway) great power, is an excellent combination puncher and has a tonne of heart. This fight will be MUCH closer then you are predicting. Guzman will need to fight his absolute heart out to win, and even then it will be very close. IMO this has FOTY written all over it.
     
  11. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    hahaha... This is such a cop out. Keep your childish mind games mate, i'm just hear to talk boxing. You do what you like, it doesn't bother me, as i have said before.
     
  12. Amsterdam

    Amsterdam Boris Christoff Full Member

    18,436
    20
    Jan 16, 2005
    No I can't argue, you take things personally and try to act as if complete impartiality on a circus of a forum is the higher ground, while being consistently incorrect and never taking value of points made by very experienced fans, but who also get involved in ridiculous discussions for comedic value, everyone has plenty to learn, even the most experienced of fans, except for Magnum.

    For example, you actually think I come here and play mind games....:lol:
     
  13. teke

    teke Titans Time !!! Full Member

    15,472
    0
    Jul 31, 2004
    My first footage of him and he looks to have good skill, he gets tagged fairly easy. First impression of him is that he is just ok.

    I would have liked to see his fight with Kat eventuate, Kat would push him hard. He looks like a fighter that likes to have time in the ring.
     
  14. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    Joan Guzman is like a Sharmba Mitchell. A good fighter who will fail at the elite level.
     
  15. MSTR

    MSTR More Speed Than Roy!!!!! Full Member

    9,247
    2
    Feb 19, 2005
    hahaha... You take yourself so seriously on here mate, its hilarious. You have serious delusions of grandeur.... Honestly, i don't care. Just stick to talking boxing please. You keep trying to bring up what happened. Basically, you tried playing mind games, and i called you out as a liar. You failed to back anything up, i started to and you pussed out. End of discussion. Why are you so hung up about it for? Move on princess :)