Bruce was a decent enough guy who only wanted enough dough to buy a small holding ,throwing him in with Baksi was stupid he never really got over it. When he retired , blind in one eye,he bought a pub.
The fight looks on the level, albeit neither fighter was particularly impressive. Woodcock had a Strong right hand, Lesnevich couldn’t stop it or take it. Lesnevich’s timing looks way off and I suspect he is past his prime here from the long layoff. Lesnevich simply wasn’t a heavyweight. Wasn’t big or strong enough. The fact Lesnevich still beat Mauriello 2x in 1947 shows me Tami’s deficiencies and that he belonged in the light heavyweight division.
You are practically arguing that Mauriello is no good because he lost to Lesnevich, Lesnevich is no good because he lost to Woodcock, and Woodcock is no good because he lost to Mauriello. That logic is too circular!
I said Tami belonged in the light heavyweight division. He had a tire around his midsection against Louis. He started his career at 144. You don’t think he could have made 175? I think had he stayed lean and in shape at 175 he could have had a better longer career. I think losing to an over the hill Lesnevich by knockout in 1947 is a bad loss. Do you think Lesnevich looks good here vs woodcock on film? I don’t. His speed, athleticism, punching ability doesn’t look good. He looks weathered and aged. Woodcock is young, strong with a right hand, but lacks skill and defense. That Lesnevich wasn’t able to expose him shows how far back he had gone. What if Lesnevich or woodcock was in the ring with Walcott or Charles here in 47? Think they have a chance? Baksi looks much better on film than both and he got badly outboxed by both Walcott and Charles
Yes you have to factor in he beat Mauriello twice while probably significantly past his prime. Fair is fair.
This content is protected Yeah how do you think Gus looks here? His reflexes look a bit shot to me. Woodcock was wide open and Gus couldn’t expose him. Part of it was Gus had trouble with woodcocks strength
I am guessing that he couldn't, or he would probably have done so when the heavyweight competition got too stiff for him. On paper yes, but Mauriello had a lot of ring wear himself, and seems to have declined fairly rapidly in 47. Whether a fighter looks good on film or not, is not always a reliable indicator of how they will perform. I would be very confident of Walcott or Charles beating either, but that doesn't mena that hey did not have some legitimacy as contenders.
Woodcocks trainer should have stopped the fight before the second round started...corner retirement. He took way too much damage
I don’t buy the Mauriello possibly being over the hill. He was 23 years old in 1947. Whose physically past his prime at 23? You’re basically still a kid. You can argue he let his body go and looked out of shape, but that’s about it.
“Same legitimacy” Do you believe Woodcock or Lesnevich had the same legitimacy as Walcott and Charles as heavyweight contenders? Do you believe Lesnevich had the same legitimacy as Charles as a light heavyweight contender?
He had 80+ professional fights at this point, and had been fighting world class opposition since he was 18. I would say that his was a formula for an early burn out.