Joe Calzaghe and Bernard Hopkins. ***** Talk!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Primadonna Kool, Jul 24, 2007.


  1. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected



    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected
    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  2. Jose FM

    Jose FM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,612
    1
    Apr 29, 2007
    NEWSFLASH. Bernard Hopkins has been fighting the best for a while now. And according to Boxrec is the #1 P4P, who has Calcracky fought? Bhop was in a division that was deeper and help the UNIFIED title, while stay at home joe defended his lone WBO title. Joe needs BHop more than Bhop needs him. Lemme just put it this way, if BHop retired right now Calzaghe would never reach Bhop on ATG list, not even close!
     
  3. lawyer400meters

    lawyer400meters New Member Full Member

    0
    0
    Feb 9, 2007
    Hopkins has dominated the light heavyweight division and he just wants to fight the best. He called out Calzaghe, and if Calzaghe wins his next fight and doesn't fight Hokins, well, then he's ducking him.
     
  4. Boinko

    Boinko Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,165
    0
    Oct 2, 2004
    A win over Kessler and then the winner of Pavlik/Taylor would solidify Calzaghe as a P4P great better than if he fought an old slow Hopkins.
    As i've said before, Calzaghe will get absolutely no credit if he beats Hopkins. Everyone will say he beat an old man and if he fought Hopkins in his prime he'd get destroyed.
    So, in this sense, Calzaghe doesn't need Hopkins at all. Short of the paycheque he'll receive, it's a no win situation.
     
  5. thesandman

    thesandman Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    5
    Jul 29, 2004
    You cannot be ****ing serious.

    dominated the lhw decision by beating Tarver??? And getting Winky up from middleweight????

    What about the guys that ACTUALLY FIGHT at 175 and aren't ancient???

    2 fights = domination in your eyes? and one was a middleweight.

    If he want's to fight the best, why get Winky up from 160? Why not try and fight an actual belt holder?

    Sweet Jesus.
     
  6. Jose FM

    Jose FM Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,612
    1
    Apr 29, 2007
    He didnt dominate but he beat the linear champ, who was regarded as the best at lightheavy. Thats teh only credit i give cause he kinda set Winky up, by making him fight him at 170 and used all the dirty tactics.
     
  7. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    :happy
     
  8. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    31
    Oct 26, 2006
    I don't think Hopkins needs to step inside the ring with Joe to be considered the best fighter today. Bernard has fought the best, beaten the best. I think its Joe that needs to step in with Hopkins if he wants to be considered the best. If Hopkins retired today, Joe would still be nowhere close to Hopkins on the ATG list. If Joe beat him, you wouldn't hear me say its only because Hopkins was old, i would give him the credit for beating a legend that is still sharp enough at this current time.
     
  9. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    Would Hopkins even be comfortable fighting at 168?

    Both JC and Kessler would fieldtrip Hopkins.
     
  10. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    This doesn't make any sense. First you ask why Hopkins doesn't need Calzaghe. Then second, you come out and say Bernard Hopkins doesn't need Joe Calzaghe. Thirdly, you critisize those who say "Hopkins doesn't need Calzaghe" and dismiss their opinion as "***** talk." Then you say if Hopkins wants to be the best he needs Joe Calzaghe because "fighters come to fight until the end of time."

    WTF:huh


    If Bernard Hopkins retired today, he would be considered the greater fighter by a vast majority of fans even if Calzaghe beats Kessler. Hopkins has been fighting the best and doesn't need Joe Calzaghe to solidify his legacy. His legacy is already set. If he beat Calzaghe, he would rise to new heights and if he lost, his legacy as an all time great wouldn't be hurt. So no, Hopkins doesn't need Calzaghe. Calzaghe could use Hopkins more than Hopkins could use Calzaghe.
     
  11. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    :good on first paragraph. In my book, a legacy is not fully solidified, when there are still great champions to be fought(at possible weights).

    To me Hopkins will always stand out as the one, that "secured" his legacy through risk/reward fights. With the reward department surpassing the risk by far.
     
  12. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,673
    100
    Jan 27, 2007
    amount of times b-hop has fought outside the states - twice

    amount of times calzaghe has fought outside the uk - twice

    :think
     
  13. Fat Tony

    Fat Tony Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,055
    1
    Apr 30, 2006
    Calzaghe was willing to fight in Denmark against Kessler, too. (Kessler didn't want it, because he wouldn't have earned anything.)
    B-Hop doesn't seem to be willing to face Joe in Britain. Joe wants to fight where the money is (at least, he says it).
    I blame Joe because of his poor opponents so far, not because he likes to stay at home.
     
  14. elias

    elias Member Full Member

    210
    0
    Jan 20, 2007
    He didn't beat Zsolt Erdei.



    Tarver was never linear champion.
     
  15. David UK

    David UK Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    0
    Feb 6, 2007
    Would Hopkins travel to Denmark to fight Kessler like Calzaghe was going to? I doubt it.