Calzaghe gets knocked down in the fight, but in the immediate aftermath it's not relevant to discuss his chin?atsch Calzaghe lands hundreds of clean shots to a guy who is often said to have a "glass jaw" and doesn't even come close to putting him away, but in the immediate aftermath it's not relevant to discuss his punching power? atsch What exactly should we discuss then, how big and strong he is and how good he looks with his stubble?? You're becoming no more than a cheerleader. If you don't think discussing chin or power in the immediate aftermath of a fight where both issues came to the fore is relevant, then hit the lounge sweetheart.
"...cast iron is a tag for instance La Motta and I don't think any sane fan would have said JC was on a par with him in this respect at all prior to last nights fight." Beatboxer you live in Scotland, did you not watch the fight on Setanta?? If you did then surely you will have heard Richie Woodhall (a man who I am sure you have defended vociferously in the past in discussions with me), surely an example of a 'sane fan' himself, remark numerous times during the fight about Calzaghe's "iron" chin?? Or were you watching with the sound down? If you look through this forum now you will find numerous references to his iron chin, his granite chin, etc etc. Your non-issue clearly is an issue when ex-boxers say it on national TV and it is a widespread belief on a forum.
You feel that this fight proves these points? What I'm saying is people pretty much already knew about both of these issues prior to last nights fight and nothing new was learned! They just don't word it the same way as you do. Prior to last nights fight did people often assert that Calzaghe at this time has very limited punch power? Yes. I think that point has been proven a fair few times in the past few years. Many fighters have attested to it in the aftermath of the fights (Lacy, Hopkins and Manfredo all asserted that he was a slapper with extremely limited power). Did the RJJ bout serve as ADDITIONAL evidence of this? Perhaps. But there was never really a question on it to answer in the first place. Now to questioning Calzaghes chin. We already knew he was suceptible to being caught by punches particularly early on in a fight, as shown by the Mitchell and Hopkins KDs. Rocky Marciano was also. Tito Trinidad another. Does this mean that any of these guys have bad chins? Nah. All of these guys have taken far bigger punches as fights have progressed proving the strength of their chins. Many were predicting Jones to score the kind of KD he did and for Joe to still win the fight convincingly... Now as I acknowledged, with the chin issue you might have a talking point there, maybe. Do I think its a major question mark in the context of last nights events? Nope. He was caught by other clean shots as the fight wore on and took them well as he has done on the other occasions in which he went down. I've seen him hit with huge punches against the likes of Kessler and not looked phased. And given how he reacted to the KD, I really don't think there is a question mark attached to his chin. Thats my opinion, and most likely the opinion of the majority.
Well, perhaps people differ in how they term these things then. For me, cast iron means the true elite in terms of chins: Oliver McCall, Lamotta, Chuvalo etc etc. I'm sure Woodhall and almost all true boxing fans would have to agree that Calzaghe is not on that level jaw wise, before and after last night. He has a very good chin, capable of taking very good punches from very good punchers.
Calzaghe is no one punch knock out merchant but he does have decent power when he decides to sit down on his puunches and not just throw half hearted pitter-patter punches. Were as Joe may not spark out his opponents they do seem to respect his power as they are reluctant to just walk through his punches. Is he a hard puncher? Probably not. But does he have decent enough power to gain the respect of his opponents? Yes. The Tarver/Johnson examples are not valid in my opinion. It is obvious Jones rapid weight loss of muscle had more to do with those KO's than anything else. Jones body is more settled now and i believe if he got hit today by those punches that KO'ed him then he would be able to take them. Calzaghe does have a very good chin. The Salem and especially Hopkins KD were more to do with timing than power. A well timed shot at an exposed chin, even by a relatively light pncher can still flaw a solid chinned man. Joe took harder shots of Jones than the KD punch (the upper cut in round 5/6 is a good example) and stayed on his feet and came back fighting. He also took huge bombs of Kessler without being flawed. If you time Joe coming in then you can floor him as he is of balance. All Joe's KD's have come when he is coming forward to throw a punch and is therefore not properly balanced. I believe he has a great chin. His powers of recovery are also world class.
I don't understand your continual desire to be on side with majority opinion. In any walk of life, that proves nothing, but on this forum, it proves even less than nothing, it is of no value whatsoever. Be your own man. I don't understand either why you have included a whole paragraph dedicated to stating Joe doesn't have a bad chin - when have I ever said he did? I have never ever said that - another example of you jumping to his defence against an attack that is not being made. In response to Richie Woodhall and many others on this forum who say he has an iron, granite etc chin, I say this has not been proven at all. He has a good chin, perhaps even a strong chin, but last night further underlined that it does not fit the description for what is commonly said to be an "iron" chin. Last night was indeed additional evidence that he has very little punching power. Again, this is relevant because many many people on here predicted a stoppage win. I myself predicted a stoppage win, I can post a link if you want. I was surprised that Joe couldn't even drop Jones despite landing so many punches. Does every thread have to be revolutionary epiphanic ground-breaking original observations never posted or even considered before? No. This is where you are being infantile. The issue I brought up on this thread was in evidence last night. I was surprised by it. If you think this isn't relevant or worth discussing, either hit the lounge or just don't comment, don't be a child trying to stub the thread out as many others have found it a contentious and highly relevant issue whether they agree or disagree. Seriously, you have disappointed on this thread. I thought you were better than a cheerleader who would try to suppress any legitimate criticisms brought up by a fight in its immediate aftermath.
pacfan 84 you are a stupid *****. 1. joe is past his prime had jones hurt in the 7th and 8th round he was suppose to close the show but decided to humiliate jones and **** with him the whole fight. 2. you know absolutley **** about boxing. 3. you are a ****ing hater and need to get over jones losing. by trying to down play JOE. 4 shut the **** up and log the **** out.
1.What 2.a 3.quality 4.poster 5.you 6.are! 7.well 8.done 9.you've 10.put 11.me 12.in 13.my 14.place 15.alright! 16.Now 17.disappear. 18.You're 19.cluttering 20.up 21.my 22.thread 23.with 24.your 25.utter 26.dog**** 27.opinions. :hi:
And I thought you were better than a petty hater. Look, I think we can come and go here. I think it is fair to say that Calzaghe does not have a cast iron chin ala say Oliver McCall and that his punch power is pretty much non existant these days. What I'm trying to say is that while it could be said that last nights fight was additional evidence of this, the proof already existed prior to last night and that the RJJ fight didn't bring up any new questions in regards to Calzaghe.... That is what I'm saying.
I don't understand your purpose by coming onto this thread then. Is no-one supposed to comment on the fight unless it was indeed ground-breaking new insights or never-heard-of stunning observations? It would be a quiet old forum then if you had your way, considering it was a match between two fighters everyone has seen fight tens of times. Calzaghe getting floored but failing to floor Jones under the circumstances in my eyes does further prove that he is not a strong puncher nor does he have what Woodhall called an "iron chin". In the past few weeks, both things have often been said about Calzaghe. The issues are relevant, the timing is pertinent, the criticisms/statements are valid and supported by new evidence. If you don't see how that justifies a thread, I think you need to re-think what a forum is and why you are here.
I think the questions had already been answered and the manner in which you raised the issues could be seen to be provocative especially given the convincing manner in which JC disposed of RJJ. The likes of you and I may well have said that it would be a JC win, but there were others out there that believed that RJJ could pull off something huge...and thus JC fans are happy with what occured last night. I know I couldn't help but have a shiver of apprehension pre-fight myself given that it was still RJJ that JC would be sharing a ring with... I think that this is an issue that we have been over many times, particularly the power thing. Theres not a day goes past on this forum where Calzaghe is ridiculed in regards to it 'slappy Joe' and you even get the odd idiot saying that he has a glass jaw on the basis of his knockdowns. The way you presented it was as if we had indeed witnessed groundbreaking new evidence that answered perennial questions about Calzaghe....when we both know that isn't the case at all. It was provocative, IMO and this thread has stimulated very little good debate and discussion from what I've read...mainly petty squabbles and arguments. Perhaps it is your good self that needs to review how he presents things if he does want to garner good feedback, you do seem to cop alot of flak on here, more than most. And it's not all irrational idiots that give you it either.
The posters I have generally found to be the very best on this site are often laudatory about me, and that's good enough for me. Flak bothers me not a jot, nor does the holy grail of majority opinion. I didn't present it like groundbreaking new evidence, if you took it as that then you have misinterpreted. It was indeed provocative. If no-one provoked debate and was satisfied with anodyne cheerleading like you, again it would be a dull old forum. The thread has had a good amount of posts, some good posters have commented, some agreed some disagreed, that's good enough for me as well, I'm not trying to win a Pulitzer on here, nor am I Budd Schulberg. You attempted to stub this out as an illegimate or worthless thread, and I don't believe it was or turned out to be. Hey, you're happy to be the poster you are, good for you. I am happy to be the poster I am. If you think discussing chin and power in the aftermath of a fight is irrelevant, then don't waste your time. Bye now
im sorry.............................puase ll i must has forgot to space my words as it is obvious your are more then a little slow. ........................................ you ............................... ...ARE ....................................... A ......................... STUPID.................................*****.................................. ...NOW...................shut................................... the ..... ..................****............................UP........................... &....... LOG.....................OUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!:good
Yet more hilarious and worthwhile observations from you. Yawn. Any more? If there are post them now please so we can get rid of you asap and enjoy a discussion free of your tired, moronic rubbish.