Joe Calzaghe p4p no.1

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by punch13, Apr 19, 2008.


  1. punch13

    punch13 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,523
    0
    Jan 14, 2007
    Calzaghe should fight Pavlik, Taylor, Tarver, or Dawson....

    BUT still, the fight with Hopkins or Jones would be more impressive to the fans. Plus, Hopkins is considered p4p boxer today.

    Calzaghe vs. Hopkins and Calzaghe vs. Jones would look more credible in the years to come compared to Calzage vs. Pavlik....

    fans will likely talk Calzaghe beat Hopkins or Jones, instead of Pavlik.
    Calzaghe beating an ATG/HOF would look more credible in discussion.
     
  2. D_knowsboxing

    D_knowsboxing The King is back Full Member

    1,971
    1
    Feb 4, 2008
    Do I need to get you banned again? You know I own you everytime you even think of questioning my superior knowledge of boxing. Say 43 yrs old... just say it... I don't care if hop was top 5 p4p... He is 43, you can't hang your hat on W over a 43 yr old.:patsch
     
  3. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    YOU GOT ME BANNED!!?:twisted: :twisted: :fire :fire
     
  4. D_knowsboxing

    D_knowsboxing The King is back Full Member

    1,971
    1
    Feb 4, 2008
    HOWEVER, it would be different if a 30 yr old Calz took on a 32 yr old RJJ... That's all I'm saying. these fights could have been made 7-10 yrs ago when these legends were prime. NOT when they are shadows of themselves.
     
  5. D_knowsboxing

    D_knowsboxing The King is back Full Member

    1,971
    1
    Feb 4, 2008

    :lol: :rofl :lol: :rofl Hell no! Quit being so guillible chump.:smoke
     
  6. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    I stilll have him at #3
     
  7. D_knowsboxing

    D_knowsboxing The King is back Full Member

    1,971
    1
    Feb 4, 2008
    I still have him top 5, but the win over bhop did nothing to improve his status IMO.
     
  8. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    i was banned for 3 months man!

    first i got a month because of too many complaints from other posters, then the night of the fight i went onto the esb chat and started owning fools because of that i got another month, after that on the comments section i was schooling some idiots and the admin added another month!

    i emailed the admin and gave him a piece of my mind, i told him whats what and he instantly unbanned me, i would be afraid too if i was messing with someone like myself.
     
  9. Axe

    Axe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,013
    3
    Jan 23, 2005
    :rofl :rofl :rofl
     
  10. D_knowsboxing

    D_knowsboxing The King is back Full Member

    1,971
    1
    Feb 4, 2008
    Yes, your e-thuggness is evident! You are like the 2Pac of ESB:roll: e-thug life for you!:lol:

    On a serious note, I didn't know you were getting in trouble like that... You should calm down on the 'sexual overtones' of your posts. I bet your best friend had something to do with the bans. What were you saying?
     
  11. Relentless

    Relentless VIP Member banned

    65,864
    16
    Mar 5, 2006
    the admin just told me to watch my language, i'm trying to stay 'clean' for a few weeks, i'm not going to argue with fitz for a few weeks and even if i do i will go easy on his ass.
     
  12. D_knowsboxing

    D_knowsboxing The King is back Full Member

    1,971
    1
    Feb 4, 2008
    Maybe you should stop talking about fathers and things like that also... Just a thought. But yeah, openly trolling fitz probably didn't help either:lol:
     
  13. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    No, but it does solidify his status and if Fraud squeeks out another split decision against the part time boxer, Ricky Martin then he would drop one or two spots.
     
  14. D_knowsboxing

    D_knowsboxing The King is back Full Member

    1,971
    1
    Feb 4, 2008
    I think PBF will KO dela this go round, b/c he is thinking that there wont be a 3rd match so he might as well make it interesting. (or at least better than the 1st fight)
     
  15. punch13

    punch13 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,523
    0
    Jan 14, 2007
    Calzaghe wasn't well known until a few ago, I don't see how the fight would've happen 6-10 years ago. Realistically speaking the fight would not happen. RJJ was at his prime 7-10 years ago, but he's still considered a top boxer. Nobody is overlooking RJJ since his fight with Trinidad.

    Both Calzaghe and RJJ should fight soon since they're similar in age. I wouldn't say the fight would be comparable to Calzaghe vs. Hopkins. Obviously, age difference is not an issue here.