Joe Calzaghe paper champ at Lt Hw

:rofl


yep, losing to calzaghe at 175 and then beating a middleweight at a 170 catchweight clearly means your the man at lightheavy you ****ing arsehole :rofl

 

Team Elite handing out a Devastating beatdown to any foolish enough to try their hand

 

I had him beating joe who many considered a top 5 p4p and the number 1 smw.

Maybe I rate joe higher than you do, I dunno.

 

:deal

 

absolutely irrelevant, your opinion isn't worth a piece of cat ****. if your gonna write tripe like that then at least write imo after it.

 

Welcome to ESB general, where beating the number 1 LHW in the world = Paper champ

 

that is right, Calzaghe beat the American Lineal champ, who only had the ring title cause it was gifted to Roy Jones Jr for being young, black, american and althletic.

doesn't change the fact that beating Hopkins at 175 was an EXCELLENT win, esp when you consider it was in America, with American judges. It is a miricle Joe won to be honest.

 

So Calzaghe's biggest achievement is that he had slightly better stamina and workrate than a 43-year-old middleweight.

 

That's one way of looking at it:
Hopkins just too old - Calzaghe

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/7349616.stm

 

True. The Ring belt is an award at best

 

Just like you ignore that he was the #1 at the division and regained the LHW title for over 4 years after Joe beat him.

 

I accept Calzaghe as the true champion, as was Jones.

 

This content is protected

 

When did the lab shut down? 2000 after Hall?

He didn't lose for another 4 years and even went up to heavy and back.

I suppose it had NOTHING to do with the fact that he was in his mid 30's, had lost a lot of weight, and had fought 50 times?