Joe Calzaghe vs Carl Froch

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Vladimir23, May 26, 2012.


  1. Pound4PoundG

    Pound4PoundG Guest

    Calzaghe would beat froch he is a little too classy for Froch.
    Froch is not brilliant at anything but he is good at a lot of things.
    Calzaghe is brilliant at some things and good at the rest.
    Frochs ballz are 100 times bigger than Calzaghes though and IMO he has already done more than calzaghe did in all his career!!
    Frochs on a mission to prove everyone wrong and right now he seems to be doing just that.
     
  2. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
    Then this confirms what I said about you being dim earlier, in that if you knew and had time to prepare, you would have an answer, but instead dont and still get yourself schooled.
    Best you go back to telling me how you know over a computer that you would be physically stronger than me Robert :-((
     
  3. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007


    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    :lol::lol:
     
  4. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
     
  5. rorschach51

    rorschach51 A Legend & A Gentleman Full Member

    12,195
    8,406
    Feb 18, 2012
    Froch has already surpassed Calzaghe, Naz and Hatton, his resume in the last few years is imo is the best in the sport and he beat almost all of them. I thought he beat Kessler as well by a score of 116-114, but he was never gonna win a decision in Denmark. Calzaghe, Naz & Hatton fought nowhere near the level of elite fighters Froch has, and most of them in the prime of their careers, unlike Calzaghe who waited till Jones was shot & B-Hop was past 40. He did fight Kessler in his prime though.
     
  6. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
     
  7. trampie

    trampie Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,230
    3
    Oct 18, 2008
    Calzaghe has a far better resume than Froch, clear losses on a resume like Kessler and Ward are a big negative for Froch not a positive when comparing boxers.

    Calzaghe beats Froch any day of the week and twice on a Sunday, Calzaghe is in the elite group of boxers, Froch is in the good group of boxers.
     
  8. rorschach51

    rorschach51 A Legend & A Gentleman Full Member

    12,195
    8,406
    Feb 18, 2012
    :patsch Your dreaming bro
     
  9. FilipMNE

    FilipMNE Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,394
    11
    Jul 3, 2011
    :lol::lol::lol: Froch is 10x better fighter than Lacy ever was!!!
     
  10. is it just yank blacks and some english that dont like calzaghe ?
     
  11. Auracle21

    Auracle21 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,998
    5
    Jan 13, 2008
    Froch's resume shits all over Calzaghe. Even head to head I think he would give Calzaghe fits.
     
  12. FrochFan

    FrochFan Active Member Full Member

    712
    0
    Mar 3, 2011
    Why do so many want to cause a divide between Froch and Calzaghe?

    They are both ATG SMW champions.
     
  13. knockout artist

    knockout artist Boxing Addict banned

    6,846
    12
    Sep 24, 2011
    Sensational post Frochfan! Couldn't agree any more with you :happy
     
  14. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,977
    3,108
    Dec 11, 2009
     
  15. andersbolton

    andersbolton Member Full Member

    132
    0
    Nov 6, 2011
    dont be silly . no super middleweight of the modern era beats andre ward. i would have give rjj the best chance