Calzaghe would beat froch he is a little too classy for Froch. Froch is not brilliant at anything but he is good at a lot of things. Calzaghe is brilliant at some things and good at the rest. Frochs ballz are 100 times bigger than Calzaghes though and IMO he has already done more than calzaghe did in all his career!! Frochs on a mission to prove everyone wrong and right now he seems to be doing just that.
Then this confirms what I said about you being dim earlier, in that if you knew and had time to prepare, you would have an answer, but instead dont and still get yourself schooled. Best you go back to telling me how you know over a computer that you would be physically stronger than me Robert :-((
This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
Froch has already surpassed Calzaghe, Naz and Hatton, his resume in the last few years is imo is the best in the sport and he beat almost all of them. I thought he beat Kessler as well by a score of 116-114, but he was never gonna win a decision in Denmark. Calzaghe, Naz & Hatton fought nowhere near the level of elite fighters Froch has, and most of them in the prime of their careers, unlike Calzaghe who waited till Jones was shot & B-Hop was past 40. He did fight Kessler in his prime though.
Calzaghe has a far better resume than Froch, clear losses on a resume like Kessler and Ward are a big negative for Froch not a positive when comparing boxers. Calzaghe beats Froch any day of the week and twice on a Sunday, Calzaghe is in the elite group of boxers, Froch is in the good group of boxers.
dont be silly . no super middleweight of the modern era beats andre ward. i would have give rjj the best chance