Joe Calzaghe vs Carl Froch

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by red cobra, May 27, 2012.


  1. knockout artist

    knockout artist Boxing Addict banned

    6,846
    12
    Sep 24, 2011

    Can't tell if you're being serious. He lost to Kessler...
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,533
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
  3. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Clearly lost to Kessler.
     
  4. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    5,856
    2,568
    Mar 24, 2005
    :-(
     
  5. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    269
    Jul 22, 2004
    Very clearly, close but clear and not a real argument for Froch. I'm guessing LUFC had Dirrell beating Froch as he's not on his list, I did too
     
  6. knockout artist

    knockout artist Boxing Addict banned

    6,846
    12
    Sep 24, 2011
    I thought Dirrell beat Froch, but you can list Dirrell as a win for Froch and I won't argue
     
  7. Grinder

    Grinder Dude, don't call me Dude Full Member

    5,856
    2,568
    Mar 24, 2005
    Froch gets disassembled by Ward -> he is hopeless
    A fight later after KOing an untested Bute -> he is beating Calzaghe in a decision

    Maybe we should be discussing if Froch can KO Hagler at MW.
     
  8. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Ridiculous comparison. Froch is not a middleweight.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,533
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    Why would I list it as a win when I thought it was a loss.
     
  10. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    Agreed, unless you count sloppy cuffing shots.
     
  11. knockout artist

    knockout artist Boxing Addict banned

    6,846
    12
    Sep 24, 2011
    Because ultimately these are our opinions, they count for nothing, neither are consensus robberies, just close fights. If you to discuss this objectively, then opinions can't affect your judgement and thus Kessler beat Froch, and Froch bear Dirrell regardless of yours and my opinion
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,533
    21,916
    Sep 15, 2009
    Judgement is entirely based on opinions in a sport as subjective as this.

    In my world where i'm comparing froch and calz, my opinion is the be all and end all.

    If I see a fight as a victory I count it as a victory. It's that simple.
     
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    So Escalera beat Tyrone Everrett? No way.

    Make your own mind up. Don't be a sheep.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,115
    Mar 21, 2007
    This idea that the sport is entirely subjective is not one I can jive with. The boxers have three people they need to imperss to win - the judges. Blatant robberies aside (and even then, i'd proceed with caution when watching a fight on TV), if you manage to impress the judges in accordance with the rules of boxing, then you have done enough, and that should be respected.

    You won't see people second guessing the judges at the gymnastics this Olympics, or ice-skating, or skateboarding etc. etc. etc. Boxing does itself no favours, but there is no reasonable reason to start over-turning justifiable results you've seen on television. That's not how boxing is scored, nor should it be. It would result in favouritism towards showey, fast punches, lots of landed shots as opposed to hard punches going in solidly. There's a difference in perception here that is important to acknoweldge and understand.
     
  15. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    :goodWell put,my friend!