Joe Calzaghe vs Mike McCallum Better Resume

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by sas6789, Aug 18, 2012.


Page 3 of 3
  1. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007
    Is this really the best someone can up with in support of Joe's resume? Mike who moved up several weight classes fought smaller fighters:lol:
     
    JASPER, Aug 19, 2012
    JASPER, Aug 19, 2012
    #31
  2. The Mangler

    The Mangler Active Member Full Member

    788
    0
    Aug 16, 2012
    McCallum.

    Calz ain't do much until the end of his career. And 2 of those wins (Bhop and Roy) don't mean much.
     
    The Mangler, Aug 19, 2012
    The Mangler, Aug 19, 2012
    #32
  3. atberry

    atberry Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,548
    19
    Sep 30, 2009
    McCallum was a magician.
     
    atberry, Aug 26, 2012
    atberry, Aug 26, 2012
    #33
  4. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    It doesn't matter at all if people knew LAcy was rubbish or not.

    What matters is that he WAS rubbish.

    Whether everyone, some or noone knew that... doesn't matter. Because it doesnt change Lacy's skills what people believe. And his skills sucked.

    So the Lacy that Calzaghe beat was rubbish (no matter whether people knew that before the fight or not).
     
    JoeAverage, Aug 26, 2012
    JoeAverage, Aug 26, 2012
    #34
  5. JASPER

    JASPER Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,214
    8
    Jul 21, 2007

    It would not matter is Eubanks was in his prime and lacy really was a beast (which we all know was never ever the case) the body snatchers resume is still exponentially better:deal
     
    JASPER, Aug 26, 2012
    JASPER, Aug 26, 2012
    #35
Page 3 of 3