Joe Calzaghe vs the best at 168-175

hearns would ko him at 168 or 175?**** off chump,turn your computer off and go to bed never to return,not at any point in hearns prime would he beat calzaghe,he,d be lucky to last 5-6 rounds.

 

i would pick him against all stated with the exception of Charles.

JC had such a unique style that it is hard to hypothesize his results against other greats

 

I was just thinking of writing the same thing to you. Do you actually watch boxing? Man some of the crap you have been spewing is amazing! Joe would lose to everyone on that list and more!

 

fool,joe punched much harder in his prime,joe's hands were gone by about 2004 which most boxing fans know,by making a statement like that proves you don't know much about boxing do you:verysad

 

No way he beats all of the except Charles, at 175??? What fights are you even basing Calzaghe's 175 capabilities on?? Old Hopkins??? Shot Jones???

If those two can drop him, no way he beats any of those 175 greats mentioned.

 

Roy has faced fighters with much more punching power than prime Calzaghe... Though Calzaghe has never faced a fighter with the power or speed of prime Jones...

If I were you, I would be the last to try to insult anyone's boxing knowledge with all the crazy **** you have been talking.:deal

No ****ing way Calzhaghe KO's prime Jones, Benn and McClellan, no ****ing way. You are the one who doesn't know boxing if you believe this rubbish...

log off you ****.

 

vs Benn - Calzaghe UD
vs Eubank - Calzaghe UD
vs Collins - Calzaghe UD
vs Mclellan - Calzaghe UD

vs Moore - Calzaghe UD
vs Tunney - Calzaghe UD
vs Foster - Calzaghe UD
vs Spinks - Calzaghe UD
vs Moorer - Calzaghe UD
vs Fitz - Calzaghe UD
vs Jones - Calzaghe brutal KO1
vs Loughran - Calzaghe UD

 

Wow, dude..

Do you really believe this?

 

NO he just likes talking **** and stirring things up! Soon his boyfriend Slurpy (SHerp) will show up agreeing with everything he/she said

 

Who knows really? These fantasy threads are pointless. We'll never know the outcome of these fights. My list is as valid as the other "expert" lists.

 

You can never be certain these days.

In other news, I'd pick Calzaghe to lose to most of these guys.

Regarding a 168 Hopkins V Calzaghe, I am not sure. On one hand, Hopkins would've likely had more stamina. On the other hand, that was Calzaghe's best weight. All in all, I'd have to agree with the assessment that the likeliest outcome of such a contest would end with Hopkins' arm being raised though.

 

You appear to have me confused with Undefeated KO specialist Anglo 'Sex Bomb' Saxon. I am on the Anglo Saxon Bullet Train. You should check it out if you are a boxing fan.

This content is protected

 

He'd have a chance at beating any of them. People often proclaim he is overrated, but he is really underrated. Prime Calzaghe v prime Jones Jr. would have been a great one.

 

what calzaghe fights have you seen,vs jones and hopkins?.you do know he had 44 fights before that don't you.i watched calzaghe from the start,missed the first 2 years of benn's career but watched the rest,the same with eubank.saw 70% of collins career so yes i watch a lot of boxing.have you seen there whole career's?no thats right you have'nt because your in the states were you've seen only a few fights from each of there career's.you asked do i actually watch boxing and the answer is yes.but you don't.calzaghe would beat all 3 of them and i base that judgement on actually watching the whole of there career's not a few fights here and there like youself you massive tit.

 

Really, KO Artist what is his Pro record? I see that you are part of his love triangle (pathetic)!