"Joe Calzaghe would beat prime Michael Spinks"- Max Kellerman

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Thread Stealer, May 23, 2009.


  1. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,888
    3,036
    Dec 11, 2009
    :lol: Now I see you really are clutching at straws :patsch, and see the pain you are in with Calzaghes winning run.
    Once again you cant name any lies, and are trying to twist the truth in saying I group Manfredo with Spinks because I wrote Spinks would be another American name in Calzaghes win column to go with Hopkins, Jones, Brewer, Mitchell, Manfredo, Sheika etc. They are American fighters that Calzaghe beat. Not once have I said anything like Manfredo and Spinks are the same level, so proof you are bending the truth, because I can PWN you so easily, so you resort to truth bending :lol:. A truth bender has no credibility :yep, and thats you:hi:
     
  2. gooners!!

    gooners!! Boxing Junkie banned

    10,166
    1
    Jan 15, 2009
    Kellerman is well renowned for going overboard with the superlatives, I mean remember his review of Paul Williams on that BAD telecast?

    Max once said Cintron was so scared of Williams that he jumped out the ring, true story.:deal
     
  3. Danny

    Danny Guest

    Looks like Kellerman has been on the drink hard this Christmas!

    Fcuking damn fool! :patsch
     
  4. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,137
    6,372
    Jan 22, 2009
    I am not "in pain" with Calzaghe's winning run.There's another one of your lies.I used to be a Calzaghe fan as I've always had a soft spot for Cymru fighters(except Enzo M)-fighters like Johnny Owen,Colin Jones,Steve Robinson etc,as I've Cymru blood in me.But since you don't know me,but still make those assumptions,you just demonstrate more of your lack of credibility.I am not a "truth bender" like you.There's another one of your lies.This is getting so easy.Just bring up an example of my bending the truth.As far as Manfredo and Spinks are concerned,I wrote that you're grouping them together,which you did,so again you're lying.You also wrote that I wrote that Qawi was an "unbeatable wrecking ball".I never wrote that.I would be like you and be a liar with no credibility if I'd done that.I never mentioned unbeatable,but I did write that he was a wrecking ball,which he was.Yet another lie.You also wrote that I've "hidden hate" for Calzaghe.I don't like him,but I don't hate him.Ray Leonard would be an example of a fighter that I hate.I hate the fact that he's a lying tosser(like you),but have never hated him.Another one of your lies.You also wrote that I finally came to terms with Calzaghe's greatness.That's another blatant lie.I have always written that Cal was a terrific fighter,but again,why should you let the truth get in the way?How many lies of yours have I just listed?You are a liar with no credibility.You lie to enforce your arguments,but because you lie with such regularity,you're constantly exposed.Constantly!Pwn-whatever the fact that means-if that includes lying on these boards to prove your point,that's definite.Because you are the king of esb liars with zero credibility.Congratulations:yep
     
  5. hussleman

    hussleman Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,976
    18
    Jun 14, 2006
    The "Spinks Jinx" would put Calfaggy down and out with 5 rounds!
     
  6. goldnarms

    goldnarms Active Member Full Member

    602
    3
    Jun 16, 2006
    I've always liked Max. But anyone who thinks Calzaghe would beat Michael Spinks is a complete fool.
     
  7. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,888
    3,036
    Dec 11, 2009
    What I wrote
    Trying to bend the truth here as I havent been using Calzaghes victories over those fighters as reasons. Total lie :dead. Truth bender
    Just to verify to a truth bender
     
  8. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,137
    6,372
    Jan 22, 2009
     
  9. Silver

    Silver The Champ is Here Full Member

    5,366
    370
    Jul 16, 2005
    seriously, that ***** is confused.
     
  10. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,226
    29,250
    Apr 4, 2005
    Spinks has the wrong style for Calzaghe. Calzaghe has always been suspectable to the right hand and if Jones and Hopkins can put him down, Spinks can knock him out. Spinks size and reach would also give Clazaghe problems.

    But I don't think it would be that easy a fight for Spinks. While Calzaghe's resume may not be great he is a very talented and able fighter. His speed, power(prior to hand issues), adaptability and workrate could see him give Spinks some problems. But Spinks is good enough to stop Calzaghe late on.
     
  11. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    You've mentioned this a few times. Aside from the RJJ thing what else has Calzaghe lied about on record?
     
  12. Ben_UK

    Ben_UK Member Full Member

    306
    0
    Dec 27, 2009
    Wikipedia Rubbish
     
  13. bailey

    bailey Loyal Member Full Member

    39,888
    3,036
    Dec 11, 2009
     
  14. bluebird

    bluebird Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,881
    2,639
    Apr 17, 2009
    When did he say this?

    I always thought Kellerman was a hater.
     
  15. Jimbob

    Jimbob Active Member Full Member

    1,142
    1
    Mar 14, 2009
    I bet Calzaghe would beat Larry Holmes too:lol: