Joe Calzaghe's 46-0 vs Floyd Mayweather's 42-0

Elaborate.

And tell why they were more able than him.

 

Rob, have you seen Conteh? Why would you think Calzaghe (who I like a great deal) is better than him?

 

fighters when 1 champ per division > fighters now imo


'champions' now are contenders then

 

this thread isnt about who would win....which i think would be Joe C btw....but who has the better record.

I think its Joe.

 

calzaghe was legit champion in 2 divisions. mayweather in 3.

 

Not a chance!

 

Prime Roy Jones would of murdered Calzaghe

 

This thread is ridiculous. FROM START TO FINISH

The OP is a ridiculous question......... and some of the answers on here or the 'debate' is borederline insanity.

**** me atsch

 

True, maybe i was a tad harsh there.

I'm sure it'd be a KO win for Jones though

 

Funnily enough, not your last point.

 

nah i think its a legit question too, on their defining win, hopkins>corrales and after that there's not a great deal to separate, apart from mayweather has more depth, but mayweather's cherrypicking hurts him badly imo, still probably have him ahead though

 

Jones wasn’t the invincible man-god that some make him out to be. I have a lot of respect for his talents at 168 in particular, but he could be pressured. I think Calzaghe could have been a formidable challenge – he’d likely have lost on points, because Jones wouldn’t ever put himself at risk against dangerous opponents.

 

:huh And Jermain Taylor beat Hopkins twice.. does that mean he's twice as good as Calzaghe?

I dunno if you're trolling mate but Calzaghe is nowhere near the level of Floyd Mayweather technically and his resume is also nowhere nears as strong (even though Floyd's himself isn't great)