It is almost sacrilege to suggest a match like this would be an equal affair worthy of discussion, and I suggest it for a reason. Choynski is a light-heavyweight who had frequent success against heavyweights, beating a green Jack Johnson in three rounds and holding Jeffries to a draw. He also gained accolades in an effort against Gentleman Jim Corbett, losing in the 27th round. His record is historically or in any other sense the much more impressive. Froch, of course, is a current 168/175-pound beltholder who is big for his weightclass. Boxing has changed. After defeating Johnson, Choynski trained and helped the Galveston Giant to construct a fighting style that ruled the world. Many of those techniques are not vital any longer due to different gloves and rules. Both men have comparable physiques. Froch stands at 185 centimeters, Choynski at 181. The highest Choynski ever weighed was 176, while Froch on fight night is often around 180 pounds or so. I don't know Choynski's reach, but considering the Cobra's freakishly long arms, suffice to say he'll enjoy a reach advantage. These men were born more than a hundred years apart. Boxing has come some way technically. There are fewer ring mechanics about, and more sports engines with only one or two gears, but good gears they are. Instead of all-round old-school skills, we have specialised fighters that make the most of their talent and try to preserve their health by fighting less. Fighters enter the ring in a primed physical state nowadays, but for the purpose of this thread, let's assume Choynski is also in perfect shape. Given all this -- you have to bet all your money. All your possessions. If you lose, you will be destitute. There is a a lot riding on the outcome. Whoever you pick, would you be a nervous wreck when the fight finally happens?
I think this is actually one of the toughest era vs era fights ever. Based on what they did in their day, Choynski should be a clear favourite. In fact even if we factor in evolution of the sport (and even species) there is enough of a class distinction to make this still uncertain. To top it off, Froch, because of all the different weight divisions and alphabet titles and few fights today may actually be quite a bit better than he is, and also quite a bit worse. Choynski also has that punch which means no matter how much the sport evolves, he has more than a punchers chance and almost certainly will be the bigger hitter. I am not sure he has necessarilly proved his chin though. There is a good chance that Froch's better combination and free flowing punches might be something Choynski hasnt seen before and will test it. The ref will play a big role, i think Choynski has the chance to dominate in the clinch adn with a few dirty tactics which gives him a big advantage over Froch. I musst admit, i am tempted to lean towards Froch, with all of my possessions on the line, but holding off for a different cross era match is definitely a better option. Do we get to see the results of any warmup matches before placing teh bet? obviously if this was the final of a super 6 tournament i would definitely be betting on Choynski. Without that, i think this would rest on a careful observation of training performances.
Is Froch around 180lbs? Big as he is, he never strays far from the weight. Great thread, well-laid out, but can't pick based on the lack of footage.