Joe Cortez : I allowed Marquez to continue...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Soriano, Feb 24, 2009.


Page 1 of 9
  1. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    In so many words, Joe Cortez revealed that if he is an enemy of the Mexican boxers, he would not have allowed Marquez to continue fighting after he was knocked 3 times by Pacquiao in their first fight.

    "If I were the enemy of Mexican fighters
    This content is protected
    I allowed him to continue and he put up the fight of his life.” -- Joe Cortez

    http://fightfan.com/2009/02/joe-cortez-marquezs-comments-are-unfounded/

    This statement of Joe Cortez has just vindicated Manny Pacquiao as the true winner of the first fight w/ JMM. He revealed his true character as "friend of Mexican boxers". He was therefore biased in favor of Marquez in that fight. He should not be allowed to officiate in future matches featuring Mexican boxers, let alone Marquez as opponent of Pacquiao.
     
    Soriano, Feb 24, 2009
    Soriano, Feb 24, 2009
    #1
  2. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006

    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

    Joe Cortez is awful.

    *******s are a ****in' riot, and they don't even get offended when they get called that. They love the guy so much they will forget logic altogether.
     
    Addie, Feb 24, 2009
    Addie, Feb 24, 2009
    #2
  3. Realspitts

    Realspitts Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,284
    0
    Nov 16, 2008
    cortez by KO
     
    Realspitts, Feb 24, 2009
    Realspitts, Feb 24, 2009
    #3
  4. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    It is not ******* in me talking, it is Joe Cortez. Bash Cortez, not us. You're barking at the wrong dog...errr tree. :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: <---- i can do that, too.
     
    Soriano, Feb 24, 2009
    Soriano, Feb 24, 2009
    #4
  5. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    ******* is actually a badge of honor. :deal
     
    Soriano, Feb 24, 2009
    Soriano, Feb 24, 2009
    #5
  6. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    This is so old. There has been so many threads made about this same story.
     
    saul_ir34, Feb 24, 2009
    saul_ir34, Feb 24, 2009
    #6
  7. borj

    borj the Pacific Storm Full Member

    2,669
    1
    Sep 3, 2008
    yeah. id like to put that in my sig. like the great ******* pacD. he's right about the DLH and hatton fights happening. true badge isn't it
     
    borj, Feb 24, 2009
    borj, Feb 24, 2009
    #7
  8. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    Not so, this Cortez's revelation is new. :deal Our suspicion is validated by this revealing interview. Ban Cortez!
     
    Soriano, Feb 24, 2009
    Soriano, Feb 24, 2009
    #8
  9. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006

    I think this happened when JMM recently asked for the inhibition of Cortez as the third man in the ring in his fight against JD.
     
    boxbox, Feb 24, 2009
    boxbox, Feb 24, 2009
    #9
  10. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    He should have said, "I am a neutral referee. I am not a friend or enemy of anyone or any nationality." He's in deep **** on this remark.
     
    Soriano, Feb 24, 2009
    Soriano, Feb 24, 2009
    #10
  11. SweetScience

    SweetScience Accuracy is the key! Full Member

    3,403
    5
    Mar 25, 2007
    Can you please make new threads already?
     
    SweetScience, Feb 24, 2009
    SweetScience, Feb 24, 2009
    #11
  12. borj

    borj the Pacific Storm Full Member

    2,669
    1
    Sep 3, 2008
    double-edged sword for cortez. he tried to defend himself about the marquez inhibition. In so doing, he will be axed by the others
     
    borj, Feb 24, 2009
    borj, Feb 24, 2009
    #12
  13. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    one judge made a scoring error that was more significant than what cortez did.
     
    enzo, Feb 24, 2009
    enzo, Feb 24, 2009
    #13
  14. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    This is new one, *****! This a new revelation by the referee himself.
    He should be investigated for this statement for declaring that he is a friend of Marquez/Mexican boxers. It showed his bias. Marquez, in his opinion should be allowed to continue, but he allowed him, nevertheless, because he is a friend. Get that? :deal
     
    Soriano, Feb 24, 2009
    Soriano, Feb 24, 2009
    #14
  15. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,265
    11,322
    Jan 6, 2007

    Get a real life, dude !

    *******s give Manny's fans a bad rep.

    Cortez was pointing out the unfairness of JMM's allegations of bias and, to bolster his case said:

    (Referee Joe Cortez spoke to Puerto Rican newspaper Primera Hora about recent comments made by Juan Manuel Marquez criticizing the potential selection of Cortez as referee for his Feb. 28 fight against Juan Diaz.)


    This content is protected


    Put the comments in their proper context.

    Clearly, JMM doesn't feel he got preferential treatment.


    And how does that statement prove that Pac won the fight ?

    You're missing some grey matter, lad.


    Pac, IMO, DID win the fight. The result was a draw, but one of the goofball refs later admitted he didn't understand the rules and would have scored the first round 10-6 if he'd had more time to read up on scoring.

    But Cortez played no role, pro or con either man in this fight.

    IMO, Pac narrowly won both fights. But they were so close that I could live with two draws or a split of the series.


    I hope they fight again.

    But I don't expect that to happen.
     
    cuchulain, Feb 24, 2009
    cuchulain, Feb 24, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 9