Joe Frazier vs. Rocky Marciano

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by spion, May 4, 2010.


  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Henry,

    I think it's very tough to imagine frazier outslugging rock at close quarters when he has only one powerful hand, compared to rocky's two fisted knockout power.
     
  2. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,921
    77
    Oct 1, 2006
    I second that. :good
     
  3. hhascup

    hhascup Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,685
    178
    Dec 27, 2006
    Rocky said many many times that he didn't like boxing on the inside. He stated that he needed room for his haymakers. I just think that they were pretty much equal, the only thing is that Frazier was 20 pounds bigger and Rocky never fought any contender besides Louis that was that heavy, unless you count Cockell. He never fought anyone that was that aggressive or as hard as Joe did. I honestly wish I could agree with you but I watched every tape there is on both, and I have to favor Frazier.
     
  4. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    Hey thats why we have opinions! I respect yours. Frazier was a great great fighter.
     
  5. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    This is a real interesting quote, because rocky had a 68" reach. I mean how much room can he get before he just completely misses you with those T rex arms? I think rocky had greater leverage punching on the inside because of his short reach.
     
  6. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    I have to agree with hhascup's take. Frazier was the best in-fighting Heavyweight of all time in my view. I wouldn't favor more than maybe a handful of Heavyweights in history to beat him.
     
  7. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,733
    Sep 14, 2005
    That's a well informative opinion. but in this case don't you see this battle becoming a slugging match? Wouldn't you want to favor the man with the two fisted power, over the fighter who relies solely on his left hook?

    Frazier was a great infighter. But rocky with those short arms 68" reach, it gave him a lot of leverage punching on the inside.
     
  8. hhascup

    hhascup Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,685
    178
    Dec 27, 2006
    I respect everyones opinion, both were Great fighters and I happen to pick Frazier for the reasons I stated before. Rocky's left hook wasn't that good according to the experts that I talked to, so it would be Frazier left hook against Rocky's right cross. I just think the left hook would win over.
     
  9. hhascup

    hhascup Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,685
    178
    Dec 27, 2006

    The only fights Frazier lost was when he couldn't get inside, so when he did, he would have the advantage because he was one of the best infighters ever.
     
  10. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    I only see Henry pop up in Marciano threads. 90% of his posts have to be in Marciano threads and it's not like he's saying the most positive stuff. I respect Henry but it's hard to not think he doesn't have some anti-Marciano agenda.

    I think people should watch the Layne and Louis fights. Rocky was great on the inside, with his short-reach. Layne tried out-slugging him but got absolutely brutalized. Power, conditioning, chin, and subtle skills. Besides, both fighters are somewhat awkward and unorthodox so one fighter won't feel like their facing a typical opponent. That uppercut and right hand will be a big key for Rocky.
     
  11. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    No question. Don't get me wrong, I think the world of the the Rock. However, I just think Frazier's defensive advantage and strength advantage (arguable, to be sure) would win the day. Do I claim to be the boxing guru of all boxing guru's? Not a chance, but in this matchup, based on what I've viewed, I just don't think I'd favor any swarmer over Frazier. Rocky is right there, though, make no mistake. I think both perform a lot better against the more modern Super Heavies than some do, for example.

    Also, neither of these men is getting stopped. As a matter of fact, if either of them is losing by stoppage (barring a Marciano cuts stoppage) I think the Rock would be more able to deliver that scenario on his part. Essentially a 50/50 fight, really. I just don't like hanging on the fence.;)
     
  12. Sardu

    Sardu RIP Mr. Bun: 2007-2012 Full Member

    3,581
    52
    Jan 22, 2008
    This matchup like the Foreman fights would be a disaster for Frazier. Frazier was a slow starter who needed a couple of rounds to start smoking. Marciano's punching power is on par with Foreman and we know what the result there was.

    Marciano KO 5 Frazier
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    Marciano by late stoppage. This is the Bonavena fight, with a man 5 times as good as Oscar facing Joe.
     
  14. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Marciano is better defensivly, punches harder, is two fisted, is more durable and has a higher workrate. Frazier´s the better left hook, is slightly bigger and pressures a bit more. Willpower is about even.

    I take Marciano. He has more levels on his game. He can wear Frazier out over 15 and stop him late. He can decision him over 15 and he can knock him out early with one punch before Frazier get´s going. The only way Frazier wins is on points. Marciano late TKO.

    As good as Smokin´ Joe was, the Rock is better.
     
  15. bodhi

    bodhi Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,229
    257
    Oct 22, 2009
    Jersey Joe Walcott. I´d pick him without hesitation.