Joe Frazier's career, without Ali

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by GordonGarner65, Jan 10, 2017.


  1. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,639
    18,433
    Jun 25, 2014
    Not if Ali never existed.

    That's what the guy asked in the first post. What if Ali never fought.

    Without Ali, there's no Miami Beach quitting on the stool. There's no Lewiston, Maine phantom punch.

    It's Liston versus Ernie Terrell. There's Liston versus Henry Cooper. Maybe Liston-Chuvalo. Not a whole lot going on before 1967 and Frazier.
     
  2. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,639
    18,433
    Jun 25, 2014
    I'm not saying Frazier beats Foreman in 1970 (when Foreman fought Chuvalo) or 1971, but Frazier took a pretty severe beating against Ali in 1971 and was in the hospital for a very long time and didn't fight for a year, and Durham brought him back very easy because Joe got the worst of that first Ali fight (physically).

    And Foreman got a lot of experience before meeting Frazier in 1973. Sometimes fighting a guy when he's still green pays off. Larry Holmes fought quite a few names before they had much experience.

    George didn't always look great in 1970 or 1971.

    If Joe hadn't have fought Ali in 1971, and he fought Foreman in George's 23rd or 24th fight instead of Foreman's 38th fight (after Joe took that beating from Ali), who knows.
     
    Last edited: Jan 10, 2017
  3. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,639
    18,433
    Jun 25, 2014
    If Ali never existed, there's no split titles. There's no heavyweight tournament.

    There's just Sonny Liston. Who beats Liston to take the title from 1964 until Frazier gets there in 1967? Anybody?

    Hell, Frazier might not do it, either. But I'm assuming he would.
     
  4. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,535
    Apr 26, 2015
    It's a style thing. Joe like most sluggers would outmuscle and impose his strength and will over his opponents. Under no circumstances could he do this vs a fighter with such imposing physical strength, speed and power. Add to it a ramrod jab.
     
  5. Eddie Ezzard

    Eddie Ezzard Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,489
    5,239
    Jan 19, 2016
    Fair comment. As strange as it sounds given the one-sided nature of the beatings dealt out by George but take out the FotC and you have a different Joe. A fit Frazier without the health issues brought on by FotC and who was mentally ready to rumble rather than sing might have made it competitive for a few rounds. And he would not, without Ali, have climbed the mountain of winning the biggest fight ever so would presumably have greater hunger.

    If he does hang in there for 5 or 6 rounds and the ref gets strict on pushing, the odds might just start to tip in Joe's favour. It's a big 'if' as the styles mesh well for George but this is a fight that Joe could've (not would've or even should've) won.
     
  6. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,291
    11,662
    Mar 19, 2012
    A greener Foreman along with a hungry peaking Smokin Joe the fight may go a bit different. I don`t know how that may play out.
     
  7. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,535
    Apr 26, 2015
    No Frazier does well vs prime Foreman. Two crushing ko losses do not magically become a Frazier win.
     
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,748
    44,301
    Apr 27, 2005
    He's talking a greener Foreman as well.
     
  9. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,291
    11,662
    Mar 19, 2012
    Absolutely. It`s hard to say how ready Foreman would have been in `70 or `71. We know he could always punch so I`m not saying he couldn`t stop Joe but there would be some doubt if you change those circumstances.
     
  10. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,291
    11,662
    Mar 19, 2012
    I`m not saying Frazier magically wins but if you factor different circumstances there would be some doubt about the outcome. Frazier wouldn`t of had all those ring miles and wear and tear along with Foreman perhaps being little too green at that stage. Foreman may get to him anyway but I don`t think it would be that easy as it looked in `73.
     
  11. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,102
    5,225
    Mar 22, 2015
    So lets say the Frazier that entered the ring for the FOC against Ali had turned up to defend against Foreman around '71 to '73 do people still think the outcome would have been as decisive for George?
    Or would the style issue still have given George as devastating a win no matter which Frazier turned up?
     
  12. GordonGarner65

    GordonGarner65 Active Member Full Member

    1,112
    883
    Nov 12, 2016
    Ive read all the above. I just dont see how Foreman fights Frazier any earlier than he did. The result doesnt change either.
    Frazier likely is the champ late sixties one way or another. Regarding Liston im sure something wouldv'e happened to him along the way (Leotis Martin or someone else) before Joe peaked. Joe likely still fought the same bunch of guys as he actually did, to establish himself as champ.
    The only difference i see, is if Joe had an easier night with someone else on March 8th 1971, he probably has another defence that year and harder opponents in '72 than he actually faced. A wild guess at 3 fights might be Patterson,Lyle , Bugner ?
    That takes him to early '73 and Foreman.
    I don't see Foreman's camp pushing Foreman for a shot much before then in any case , in reality they timed things right .Ali's prescence on the scene had little to do with the timing of Frazier/Foreman, so in his abscence i can't see things being different.
    It's true that without the FOTC , Frazier would've been more healthy , but without it he would've taken tougher fights in '72, so he would've gotten some wear and tear that didn't come with the Stander/ Daniels fights.
     
  13. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,639
    18,433
    Jun 25, 2014
    I don't know if Foreman's team would've moved him any quicker, either.

    HOWEVER (big however), let's say Frazier beats Liston for the title around 1967. Foreman became friends with Liston around 1968, after first turning pro, when he served as Liston's sparring partner. Some of the guys training Foreman back then also were Liston's trainers, like Dick Sadler.

    If Frazier had been the dominant champ post-Liston (with no Ali ever having ever fought) ... and Frazier's team offered the Olympic gold medalist a title shot after George beat Chuvalo in 1970, whose to say that Sadler wouldn't have wanted to get revenge on Frazier with his young fighter Foreman?

    Gold medalist Frazier fought for a title in his 20th pro fight (against Mathis) three years after turning pro in 1965. Gold medalist Ali fought Liston for the title in his 20th pro fight just three years after turning pro. Silver medalist Ingemar Johansson fought for the title in his 22nd pro fight against Patterson. Ed Sanders, the 1952 Gold medalist, was moved TOO fast and was dead by his ninth fight. Pete Rademacher, the 1956 medalist, fought for the title in his first pro fight.

    Olympians were being moved much quicker at that time. Foreman was sort of the oddball who waited until nearly his 40th pro fight before fighting for the title.

    Foreman stopped Chuvalo in his 22nd pro fight. It was a pretty high-profile fight. Chuvalo was coming off a pretty big KO win over highly rated Jerry Quarry.

    If Frazier had run thru the usual suspects in the late 1960s, I could see them offering young George Foreman a title fight in 1970 or early 1971. Frazier wouldn't have had any big money fights waiting for him. Foreman was very well known after the Olympics. Without the WBA tournament, Ellis probably wouldn't have been in the picture. (Ellis moved up to heavyweight and got a win over Johnny Persol in early 67, which put him in the tourney, and three fights later he had a belt. No tourney, and none of those fights with Bonavena or Martin or Quarry probably happen.)

    I could see Frazier-Foreman happening in late 1970 or early 1971. Chuvalo and Quarry were top contenders. And Foreman had just beaten Chuvalo. Frazier probably would've already faced Chuvalo and Quarry (maybe more than once). Foreman would've been up.
     
    Last edited: Jan 11, 2017
  14. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,108
    8,543
    Jul 17, 2009
    Joe beats an ageing Liston in the late sixties. Prime for prime a different matter,maybe. As I've said before,though,on another thread it's quite feasible that Ernie Terrel could beat an old Sonny first.
     
  15. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,639
    18,433
    Jun 25, 2014
    I could see what you're saying, based on Ernie's performance against Cleveland Williams. I wouldn't take Terrell over Liston in a 15-round fight. But, if Ernie managed to last all 15 rounds and win a decision, I don't think he could do it twice.

    I think Liston would've reigned until at least Frazier came on the scene.

    Even after his image was destroyed by Ali, Sonny was still a destructive fighter. Without Ali taking him down, Liston's rep as dominant champ would've been insane by the mid 60s.