And by the same token if there is no test, that also means there were even more drug cheats that we don’t know about. It’s like saying there was no drinking during prohibition.
Heavyweights: 1950s Average height: 6 foot 0.7 inches Tallest year: 1955 (6 foot 1.3) Shortest year: 1952 (5 foot 11.9) 1960s Average height: 6 foot 1 inch Tallest year: 1961 (6 foot 1.3) Shortest year: 1967 (6 foot 0.4) 1970s Average height: 6 foot 2.1 inches Tallest year: 1976 (6 foot 2.9) Shortest year: 1970 (6 foot 0.6) 1980s Average height: 6 foot 2.7 inches Tallest year: 1984 (6 foot 3.1) Shortest year: 1981 (6 foot 2.3) 1990s Average height: 6 foot 3.1 inches Tallest year: 1994 (6 foot 3.7) Shortest year: 1993 (6 foot 2.4) 2000s Average height: 6 foot 3 inches Tallest year: 2008 (6 foot 4.1 - tallest year on record) Shortest year: 2003 (6 foot 2.2) Shut up choklab.
This just confirms what I said. The information you have here agrees wholeheartedly with my theory. The heavyweight population indeed grew 4 inches in the 50 years that the American population stabilised at 5’9” with a 1% of guys as tall as 6’4”. During that 50 years of national stabilised growth in America the Europeans grew enough to roughly match the average height of the American population which had previously been the tallest nation. With the exception of Holland and Montenegro, Today the height differential is negligible between America and Europe.
That's great. So we agree that heavyweights have continued to get taller, thereby allowing them to hold more weight?
Who keeps voting for Joyce it's mental. I'd pick Gassiev to utterly destroy Joyce if they fought tomorrow, destroy him, pillage him. But Joyce is going to beat Rocky ****ing Marciano? Gimme a break peeps.
Yes we agree that taller, heavier heavyweights have become more successful in boxing than at any point in history. which is surprising, all things considered. Being taller has always allowed people to carry more weight but it has not always made them successful at boxing. I don’t think Jimmy Wilde would have been more successful had he bulked up to middleweight.
that'snot even moderately what I asked you. Do you agree that heavyweights have been getting taller over the last fifty years on average, thereby allowing heavyweights to carry more weight comfortably, on average?
It is the whole “allowing heavyweights to carry more weight comfortably” part that is the sticking point with me. Have the successful heavyweights got bigger? Yes. Absolutely yes. Have the taller heavyweights managed to carry weight more comfortably than before? Yes. Now why is that? Why is it that tall guys like Ernie Terrell, Gerry Cooney, Tony Alongi, Larry Middleton and Chuck Gardner were unable to train up to 260lb so that they could dominate the eras they fought in using a considerable functional weight advantage?..