Joe Louis as the P4P greatest

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Boilermaker, Mar 31, 2011.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,254
    20,922
    Sep 15, 2009
    This is where the waters get muddy. We suggest had if beaten charles and rocky he'd remembered more fondly. I disagree. Lets say his career extended to the point he actually fought rocky, charles and rocky would not be remembered as atg's. Neither would walcott. They'd be another example of top rated challengers losing to the main man.

    The only possible way he improves his resume is by retiring and coming back to beat a legitimate champion. Anything else and the names mean little considering his dominance.

    Had louis retired and then come back and knocked out rocky before retiring again, I don't think rocky gets remembered as a top 5 atg. I think his stock drastically diminishes to a far lower level.

    The truth, imo, is due to how dominant he was, we'll never know how good his victories are.
     
  2. Liechhardt

    Liechhardt Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,510
    7
    Mar 25, 2010
    #2 h/w and # 6 p4p after Armstrong,SRR, Greb, Ali, Duran.
     
  3. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    I agree with this.

    In fact this is part of my point. Rays competition (which was great) gets over rated. Most of their crowning performances are wins over Ray Robinson. Joe was too dominant to let anyone get this credit.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,254
    20,922
    Sep 15, 2009
    Exactly his top middleweight opponents all contain him as their best victory. That's also why he gets credit for beating so many world champions, because they won the belt off him.

    With louis, apart from early on and late on there is only really him as an active world champion due to his dominance. We all know rocky is rated so high because he's unbeaten. If louis beats his he won't be remembered nowhere near as high. Charles and walcott are remembered for being champs who had a lot of back and forth, again if louis beats charles they don't get remembered as highly. He was that dominant it's literally worked against him.
     
  5. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    73
    Apr 4, 2010
    You have some truly absurd opinions. I could probably name 20 guys Ray beat that were better than Braddock, at least 5 better than Schmeling, and given the circumstances of his bouts against the likes of Lewis, Bivins, Conn, and Walcott, at least a few more better wins for Ray.
     
  6. chancery

    chancery Member Full Member

    124
    0
    Mar 28, 2011
    this is a difficult question, really an opinion. tough to see a heavyweight p4P. it would have to be ALI or maybe Louis if it was any heavyweight. Sugar Ray dominated 2 weight classes and beat everbody! Joe louis dominated the most glorious division. Joe did have an unreal 25 title defenses. all opinion, some could Julio Cesar Chavez is the p4p. legit claim, archie moore most knockouts all time could be called p4P based on KO #. i would take Sugar Ray R over JOE maybe simply becuase Joe made a comeback and got hammered by marciano. the little things.
     
  7. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    Go on then.

    Who are the 20 guys that were capable of winning the world heavyweight championship but lost to Ray Robinson?
     
  8. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    73
    Apr 4, 2010
    What kind of stupid ass **** is that?
     
  9. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    82
    May 30, 2009
    Roach thinks he's the greatest P4P fighter.
     
  10. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    I dont know, i am not the one who suggested 20 guys Ray beat were better than Jimmy Braddock.
     
  11. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    73
    Apr 4, 2010
    You started a thread on pound for pound greatness. I can name 20 better fighters pound for pound than Braddock that Robinson beat, which is what you knew I meant. If that isn't what you meant, then it was a completely irrelevant point to make in the first place in a pound for pound discussion.
     
  12. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    Jimmy Braddock was a pound for pound great. A natural supermiddleweight, he was eventually good enough to bulk up and win the World heavyweight championship. That is an impressive pound for pound feat. Not too far different to a lightweight going up and winning the middleweight title or even a natural welterweight rising and winning the light heavyweight world title (i can think of a pretty good one that almost did :good). But the point is, he was an excellent pound for pound fighter in his own right. So, my question, is who are the 20 fighters that Ray beat, who are pound for pound fighters anywhere near this level. It is a serious question. I cant think of any.
     
  13. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    And since most of Rays opponents in the second half of his career were also, like braddock, natural middleweights, you would think that they could have done the same if they were better than Braddock.
     
  14. the cobra

    the cobra Awesomeizationism! Full Member

    12,028
    104
    Jun 30, 2008
    So a heavyweight beating up blown up middleweights is more impressive than a welterweight (who started at Lightweight) beating up middleweights? Into his 40's? That's what you're trying to say?
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,254
    20,922
    Sep 15, 2009
    Imo, anyone dismissing louis's claim to be number 1, does not know boxing. I might not place him number 1, but how can you seriously dismiss his claim, he is the single most dominant champ in history.