Joe Louis decline ? Or was Walcott and Charles that good ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Dance84, Mar 5, 2020.


  1. janitor

    janitor VIP Member

    72,021
    28,050
    Feb 15, 2006
    I always fancied that Walcott would have been the tougher fight, if they had both got him on the same day.

    I just think that Charles would have been easier to catch up with.
     
    Bummy Davis and LoadedGlove like this.
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,296
    27,906
    Jan 3, 2007
    Perhaps. But regardless the Joe Louis of 1937-1942 was a very different man from the one who faced either of them.
     
  3. 70sFan865

    70sFan865 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,547
    9,593
    May 30, 2019
    If Louis wasn't that good, then there is no good HW in division history... Questioning Louis greatness and ability is silly.
     
    The Senator and George Crowcroft like this.
  4. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,886
    Feb 23, 2020
    It might be the other way round. Charles won 2 decisions against Walcott and from what I've read probably deserved the 4th fight.
     
  5. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,759
    46,718
    Mar 3, 2019
    Charles deserved the 4th as much as Walcott deserved the 2nd, by all accounts. The difference being that Charles landed a real hard KD.
     
  6. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,804
    2,406
    Aug 26, 2004
    Joe fought him before, knew what to expect and when Walcott got fancy Joe was waiting for him like a spider to a fly and threw a 6-punch buzzsaw of power shots - similar to what took out Billy Conn in fight 1

    Based on total accomplishments- skill & power/combo punching- I rate Joe Louis the Greatest - he is my number one
     
  7. DavidC77

    DavidC77 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,945
    1,652
    Aug 30, 2018
    Righto...