"Joe Louis of '40 vs. Muhammad Ali of '67" in a time machine/fantasy bout. Who wins?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MRBILL, Feb 1, 2011.


  1. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    107
    Oct 9, 2008
    The Ali of pre 1978 was not the kind of fighter one could KO... NOPE! If Ali was to be KO'd prior to age 36, his ass would've been KO'd by at least two or three of the monsterous hitters he faced between 1960 thru 1977...

    Joe Louis of 1940 AIN'T gonna catch and stop 1967 Ali on Fantasy Island... NO, NO!!

    Z plane. Z plane..:deal
    :bbb

    SR.BILLARDO:hat
     
  2. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    Mr. Bill,,,,,,I agree no KO,,,,,,,That fight would be like watching paint dry..:hi:
     
  3. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    Any human being can be knocked out. This isn't X-Men. And Ali didn't ever face a guy who could bring KO punishment as quickly or accurately as Louis, that combination punching is far far better than anyone Ali ever faced.
     
  4. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,888
    12,634
    Jan 4, 2008
    I agree that Louis would be the most dangerous fighter Ali ever met and that you can't completely rule out a KO, but I don't think he was a "far, far better" combination puncher than Patterson. Better, yes, but not from another universe.
     
  5. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    I do. Especially the Patterson at that point. He had lost the blinding handspeed that made his combos as good as they were. He was also throwing less complicated combinations as well IMO.... Louis' punches are an unrivalled combination of quick speed, huge power, accuracy in terms of hitting vital points, and design as far as breaking a fighter down... The only one who comes close is robinson, and even then I think his combinations are less intelligently put together. Or perhaps Tyson.
     
  6. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,888
    12,634
    Jan 4, 2008
    Never saw Floyd look better than he did against Ellis. At 37 he still looked fast and sharp against Bonavena and Ali.

    Actually, the argument can well be made that he hit his peak in the mid 60's. He had lost a little bit of his speed, but made up for it by being a more well-rounded ring general. What you see as him throwing "less complicated combinations" I'd probably rather put down as someone picking his shots more carefully.
     
  7. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    I could see either fighter winning.
    No one would dominate this fight.

    Strictly a stale-mate chess match, as each others skills neutralize each others strength.
    I would think, that Muhammad Ali would stay on the outside for the whole fight,
    never risking a 1-2 exhange.

    And with Joe Louis, trying to match Ali jab-for-jab will not cut it.

    This one is close, as it would depend on the judges.
    One who favors aggression points, or one who favors boxing points.
    Clearly no 'knock-out'.

    C'mon Jorodz, twist this one.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,186
    46,417
    Mar 21, 2007
    I do too.
     
  9. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    107
    Oct 9, 2008
    People like to state how great a combo puncher Louis was and, he was too, but on the flip side of the coin, Louis never faced a dude as sizable and as fast, tuff, savvy and awesome as 1967 Ali...
    :thumbsup:deal:bbb

    SR.BILLARDO:yep
     
  10. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    what? no man, he was not better at 30+ and after devastating losses to liston. Like every other old boxer, he had become tentative and clearly lost his former ability to pull the trigger. I really don't know what you're talking about when you're saying that Patterson looked his best against Ellis.
     
  11. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    107
    Oct 9, 2008
    I think Ali gained some physical upper body strength during his early 70s comeback that he lacked as a youthful 1960s heavyweight / champion... His power in his right was also a tad better too... BUT! His leg speed and flashy reflexes dipped a notch...

    MR.BILL:deal
     
  12. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    Ali dominates him.
     
  13. MMJoe

    MMJoe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,844
    34
    Apr 23, 2009
    Yeah, probably right. Ali only faced feather fisted-guys like Foreman, Shavers, Lyle, Frazer...:patsch
     
  14. Il Duce

    Il Duce Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,972
    43
    Nov 18, 2010
    Styles makes fights.

    Joe Louis would 'not' have to knock-out Muhammad Ali to win this fight.

    Same for Ali, he could win this fight by TKO as well.

    Conditioning wins this fight.,,,,,,,Who was the better conditioned fighter..???
     
  15. Jorodz

    Jorodz watching Gatti Ward 1... Full Member

    21,677
    50
    Sep 8, 2007
    can't do it man. that's about as objective analysis as you'll get of one of the toughest h2h match ups i can imagine. good work:thumbsup