Joe Louis on Rocky Marciano (Murray Warner Tournament)

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by guilalah, Aug 17, 2008.


  1. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,344
    297
    Jul 30, 2004
    I transcribed Louis's comments on Marciano from the audio-extra's on the Ali-Marciano Superfight disk.


    -----------

    Murray Warner Computer Tournament

    Louis-Fitzsimmons post fight interviews
    (plugging the Marciano-Baer contest)

    Comments begin at 1:03:15 (as found on the
    Ali-Marciano Superfight dvd extras:
    Audio Fights -- Marciano/Baer)
    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    Interviewer: Joe, what about a fight between Joe Louis and Rocky Marciano?

    Joe Louis: Well, I could say that very easily. Marciano beat me . . .

    Interviewer (interupts): Oh, yeah, now that wasn't when you were at your best. I'm talking about when you were at your best, twenty-eight years old.

    Joe Louis: Oh, I don't know. Marciano's the type of fighter I think is good enough and strong enough and takes a good enough punch to fight anybody.
    I don't think that no one, (unclear word) either Dempsey or me, could say "I could beat Marciano".
    I think the fight could be . . . It's close, it'd have to be a close fight, because he's too strong, and he could take a good punch, and he just . . . you just can't say that I could beat him.
    I'd like to say that I'd fight him, alright, but who would win, I wouldn't know; but I'd like the pay for the fight -- i think it would draw money, though.

    -------

    I suspect Louis's 'could' -- "you just can't say that I could beat him" -- should be understood as meaning 'would'. His statement "I'd like to say that I'd fight him, alright, but who would win, I wouldn't know" strikes me as supporting such an interpretation; unless Louis meant "I'd like to say (but I can't)" -- which I think is a far less likely interpretation, though not impossible.
     
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,067
    3,694
    Sep 14, 2005
    Louis would have taken marciano........I dont think people realize how good louis was in the 1930s. marciano was one of the best ever, but louis WAS the best ever. louis would have taken everyone in history.
     
  3. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,344
    297
    Jul 30, 2004
    The two questions I've always had about this quote are:

    1) When did Louis say this? Not anytime around 1990, certainly -- he was some time dead by then.

    2) Does 'never' mean 'never in my life'?; or does it mean that 1951 Louis could never have beaten Marciano? Though I think the former meaning is more likely, since we've already read "throughout my career".

    I'm not saying Louis didn't say or mean this. But I'd give it much more weight if I knew when and to whom he is supposed to have made this comment, particularly as I haven't seen any reference to this comment until sometime after his death.
     
  4. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,448
    Jan 6, 2007
    The great champions, in their own minds, believe no one could of beat them.

    To me, take the Top 10 heavies, and have box-off and you would might have a different "winner" each time.
     
  5. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,198
    26,477
    Feb 15, 2006
    What Louis was saying was that Marciano brings enough to the table that he could not guarantee the outcome and would have a tough fight even if he won.

    Seems a verry fair asesment to me.
     
  6. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,344
    297
    Jul 30, 2004
    Carmelo Modica wrote
    'Never' could mean a) never in Louis's whole career; or b) it could mean that the '51 Louis could never have beaten -- eg, had no chance of beqating -- Marciano. But I do think that, since it's previously stated Louis had a problem with crowders "throughout (his) career", the likely meaning is 'never in his entire career'.

    As to the veracity of the quote, it may well be a genuine quote. I tend to suspect it is. But what makes it 'obvious' that he said it? It's obviously claimed that he said it; and I hope that the author wouldn't make up a quote. I'd just be a bit more comfortable, given that the quote surfaced somewhat after Louis's death, if there were some explanation of where the quote came from. I think Louis likely said it.
     
  7. Quickhands21

    Quickhands21 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,084
    10
    Nov 10, 2007
    What Louis was doing is being modest.Thats what fighters say ALL the time.He was a humble champ
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    111,842
    45,567
    Mar 21, 2007
    I agree. Fighters often defer to champions past and present without it really meaning anything. Always interesting but never conclusive. I would be very, very interested to hear qhat Vitali Klitschko would have to say about this match up, more so than Louis' take.
     
  9. Brian123

    Brian123 ESB WORLD CHAMPION Full Member

    2,765
    3
    Feb 16, 2008
    I have heard/read Louis said Rocky could beat him many times-and I take Luois at his word-Marciano would beat me.
     
  10. Dempsey1238

    Dempsey1238 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,632
    3,436
    Jul 10, 2005
    Well Louis did have problems with Godey, and Godey was no Marciano of couse.

    On a good day, Rocky Marciano could beat a prime Louis as Schemling did. I favor Louis, but Marciano brings the right style to crowd Louis, and take Joe out of his game like Godey did in the first fight. Marciano also wont be open for the uppercut like Godey was in the rematch. The back lead that Marciano does kinda of makes that punch inaffected.
    Louis did fight Marciano, past his prime, but he went plenty of rounds to judge the Rock's skills, and sort of compare it to a prime fight.

    Now I dont put a lot of stock in a Marciano Louis 1951 as a determind outcome of a prime fight. I belive that Louis was on the way out, and Marciano has not relly hit his peak yet. That would come against Matthews, Walcott, LarSarza a year or so later.
     
  11. Marciano Frazier

    Marciano Frazier Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    55
    Jul 20, 2004
    I think Louis probably did believe that Marciano could/would have beaten him in his prime. That doesn't necessarily mean so much, of course- as a third-party observer, I nevertheless feel Louis should be the favorite over Marciano.
     
  12. Hank

    Hank Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,463
    15
    Dec 30, 2006
    Both would praise the other, that's how they both were. Marciano would win in my opinion, but do I know for sure? No, none of us do.
     
  13. flamengo

    flamengo Coool as a Cucumber. Full Member

    10,718
    8
    Aug 4, 2008
    This is a bit suprising, and humble from Joe, considering the far less diplomatic assessment he offered prior to the return with Schmeling.
     
  14. Seasoned Veteran

    Seasoned Veteran Member Full Member

    168
    0
    Apr 18, 2008
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    51,363
    41,283
    Apr 27, 2005
    I took home about the same.