:thinkinteresting post. which heavies do you seeing losing fewer fights than louis does if they were forced to fight the top 20 all time? this is how i tend to think of ranking h2h fighters. i think lewis, ali and possibly tyson loss fewer. holyfield, louis, liston, foreman are on the next tier. frazier, marciano, wlad are on the next if i had to do it on the spot (though i am pretty ****ing high right now:rasta)
Burt, Been following the game for almost half a century and been around some training camps in my time. Some of the posts on here are, imo , based more on thinking with the heart as opposed to the head. I could quite as easily have used Marciano as the name put forward to get a point across. Don't get me wrong, Joe and Rocky were great but Joe could be hurt early and outboxed and Rocky was just to damn small to compete with some of the skilled big guys. I have spent a lot of time reading through this forum over the years and if anything Rocky gets overated more than Joe in this repsect.....some posters never pick against him in a fantasy match, regardless who he is up against and that smacks of hero worship as opposed to logical thinking. Sure i am an Ali fan but i fully ackowledge the risk he would take in facing someone like a prime Lennox or Tyson as these guys have the skill to go with the firepower. It all boils down to the styles thing again. Put an average 215lb+ guy in with Joe or Rocky and they both put a beating on him no doubt. Put a 240lb guy in there with some skills and it's a whole different ball game. As for some who say size does not matter, try getting in the ring with a 200lb heavy then go a round with a guy weighing 40lb more who knows what he is doing.....trust me it makes a huge difference.
For gosh sakes, Billy Conn started fighting as a lightheavyweight when he was 22 years old in 1939...He only fought at 160 pounds when he was but 18 years of age,without one bout as an amateur, and was morphing into as tough a lightheavyweight as anyone in history, though not a concussive puncher Conn beat every heavyweight he fought sans Joe Louis... So Billy Conn was a true lightheavyweight just as much as Ezzard Charles who also started his great career as a terrific middleweight...
Douglas is a fighter who basicaly only had one good fight, which had as much to do with his opponents preparation as anything else. Louis is not going to turn up for the fight badly prepared and lacking motivation. Even if it is going arse over tits, he is going to keep his cool and pull out the win. Realisticaly you would have to favour Louis very heavily. This is probably going to be more like Douglas Holyfield to be honest. The difference between Louis and Tyson, is that you don't have to attack Tyson based on fights he "nearly lost" or "might have lost in a fantasy fight". Douglas is a fighter who actualy did beat him.
About the Conn thing. First of all, Conn didn't box and move. I can't really believe people are still saying that, that's debunked. Second, Conn got knocked out. If he'd somehow survived the 13th, you'd have to presume he'd be doing extremely well to win the fourteenth...so he'd basically be in a box off with Louis in the 15th for the fight, having nearly been KO'd in the 13th. But he didn't survive. He got knocked out.
In terms of h2h he's in my top 2. There's only one man I pick to beat Louis and that's Ali. There's only one man I pick to beat Ali and that's Frazier (he doesn't do as well across the board though).
Well basically, that's what I wrote. 13: He won 14: He probably would have won given Conn's condition if Conn had somehow survived 15: A box off for the result favouring Louis given that Conn was all but Ko'd in the thirteenth in this scenario.
Louis is obviously deservedly rated very highly head to head, but I do see his chin being a problem against hard punching fast starters like Foreman and Tyson. Louis overall may have been better, but he Louis was decked many times in his career and Foreman and Tyson were great at bouncing guys off of the canvas repeatedly in a short time span to force a stoppage. I rate Louis #1 overall at heavyweight, but not #1 H2H at heavyweight. I think Ali, Holmes, Foreman, and Tyson would beat him in prime vs prime match ups. Marciano and Lewis would be 50/50 match ups.
Conn's such an underestimated fighter compared to some of his contemporaries imo.there are times i wonder if he wasn't the best post-greb light heavy.
janitor, you know you never say anything about styles. I asked you a pretty simple question. Imagine Louis in Tyson's place and explain to us what exactly is keeping Louis from getting knocked out. All I hear from you in response is some incoherent mumblings about preparation and motivation. That's not good enough. Which of the big guys that Louis fought had the hand speed and combination punching of Douglas? Answer: none. In a fight against Louis, Douglas' reach, hand speed, and more advanced footwork will mean that he gets off first. So explain to me what Louis is going to do to keep himself from getting knocked out. We know Louis isn't going to jump on the back foot all of a sudden. And even if he tried that, the result would likely be disastrous for him since that's not his style. If he tries to "get low" and bob and weave, his foot speed will be even slower, and he's not going to do this any better than Tokyo Tyson. So what is he going to do? Plod forward and get his head knocked off? Sounds about right to me. :thumbsup
Does Louis even have faster footspeed than Douglas sub 200? It's really bad when you neither have the reach nor footspeed, nor the bobbing and weaving to reach your opponent.
His footspeed and lack of quick transitions make him a huge underdog against bigger fighters with skill/speed. He would get caught in punching range with his upright methodical/slow there to be hit style. I would favor Tokyo Douglas over Joe every single time barring punchers chance.