Joe Louis v Bermane Stiverne?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Jul 3, 2014.


  1. Piece

    Piece Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,476
    7
    May 3, 2014
    Galento didn't have bad technique.

    He would fit in great in this era.

    Completely immobile, but a huge left hook and a huge right hand.

    The guy is incredibly explosive with his left hook. What puncher in the current heavyweight division has a comparable, explosive left hook?
     
  2. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,158
    Feb 11, 2005
    Are you serious?

    He was a one trick pony who had shitty footwork, kept his hands at his waist when it was major deficit to do so, led the same way with each exchange, gave huge tells and left little to doubt for his opponent. He remains a veritable instruction guide on How Not to Box. His talent was that he dragged better fighters down to his level and was tough as nails.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i2DWswsfpmI
     
  3. ForemanJab

    ForemanJab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,992
    12,317
    May 8, 2014
    Stiverne by round 4 KO. Boxing has evolved far past Joe Louis' time.
     
  4. grumpy old man

    grumpy old man Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,029
    6
    Jun 1, 2014
    Stiverne is showing little sign of being the next Joe Louis either.

    Louis an ATG. Stiverne just a guy with a belt.
     
  5. Ali Frazier

    Ali Frazier KO ARTIST Full Member

    952
    18
    Mar 9, 2014
    Has Bermane even been tested yet? Smh

    Louis KO4
     
  6. OvidsExile

    OvidsExile At a minimum, a huckleberry over your persimmon. Full Member

    35,219
    37,957
    Aug 28, 2012
    Stiverne too fast, too slick, too black.
     
  7. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    5,506
    7,041
    Aug 17, 2011
    Too black?
     
  8. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    You are right we are measuring an incomplete work but as the thread was started yesterday and not in say 8 years time we can only judge the big modern heavy with titties as he is right up til now in his career
     
  9. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    If galento didn't have bad technique then I am a wlad cheerleader :nut

    Powerful left hook yes but a fat out of shape alley brawler
     
  10. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    Not to offend, but it's simplistic and somewhat lazy thinking to suggest that this ends inside a round in Louis' favour.
    Stiverne is a solid, strong fighter with good skills. His style is not conducive to an early Louis knockout since he's quite content to pick his spots and bide his time.

    I think this is one of those matchups that is as much an era matchup as it is a matchup between two fighters, since so much has changed between Louis' era and Stiverne's.

    Of course, if we're simply comparing skills then Louis for me is miles ahead, but it's not quite that simple. Stiverne is a solid 240-pounder who can box and punch, so he's not easy meat like a Johnny Paycheck.

    That said, I wasn't particularly impressed with Stiverne in his last fight. He was getting outworked by the game but limited Arreola (whom he had already beaten) and he shipped some big shots.
    His power surfaced and that smoothed over the cracks, but he was getting hit a lot with right hands.

    Arreola and Louis have different styles, but I think a faster, sharper puncher like Louis would be able to penetrate Stiverne's high guard far more regularly than Arreola did.

    But it wouldn't be an easy fight in my eyes. Stiverne is a good overall puncher and has good skills. The one area which usually favours the modern fighters much more, but is not going to here, is height.
    They are about the same height (6'2") and the reach difference is not significant enough to be a big factor. So Stiverne has bulk and strength on his side, Louis has speed and sharpness on his. (Not to mention a decided edge in overall skill)
     
  11. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    There's no proof that Stiverne is anything but a 1 round ko victim of the greatest heavyweight puncher of all time....no proof at all.
     
  12. hookfromhell

    hookfromhell Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,861
    48
    May 5, 2011
    It took him 6 rounds to stop Arreola, but he's going to stop the greatest
    boxer puncher in history within 4. I think not. Stiverne has a right hand
    and a decent chin that's about it. Don't see him at this stage beating any elite heavies. Could be interesting against Wlad, I doubt it though.
     
  13. Piece

    Piece Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,476
    7
    May 3, 2014
    I don't think his defense or his footwork is great at all, but he has a classic power puncher stance.

    In his stance, and positioning, he can get maximal power from his punches.

    Remember, this guy was a strong man, and while many power lifters look out of shape, they tend to be very explosive.

    He was a very dangerous puncher, and while his boxing ability obviously left a lot to be desired, at least he used his short stature to his advantage.

    If anyone got a in a pure shootout with him, his punch could knock somebody's head off.

    There was very fat, but incredibly strong Japanese fighter at a boxing gym, and the guy couldn't do much of anything, but he had more power than any other fighter I've ever seen, and I've seen a lot.

    He was short, probably nore more than 5'9'' and about 240 lbs or more.

    But if he connected his punch on you, it was lights out.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,077
    Jun 2, 2006
    Excellent post!:good
     
  15. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,667
    2,153
    Aug 26, 2004
    Louis takes him out before the 5th round