Joe Louis v Jersey Joe Walcott 1

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Sep 29, 2009.


  1. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    So your side wiith Louis in a fight that you only seen half the rounds of where Louis was the worse in the action and floored twice? Yes or No?

    Even Louis disagrees with you.

    [url]
    This content is protected
    [/url]
    Wallcot
    • Louis was down in rounds one and four.
    • Louis was so disgusted by his performance that he attempted to leave the ring as soon as the fight ended, but he was restrained by his handlers.
    • A ringside poll of 32 boxing writers had 21 scoring the bout for Walcott, ten scoring it for Louis and one calling it a draw.
    Newspaper Votes
    • Jim Schlemmer, sporting editor, Akron Beacon Journal (Akron, OH) - Walcott
    • Jesse A. Linthicum, sporting editor, The Sun (Baltimore, MD) - 8-5-2 Walcott (score provided by Associated Press)
    • Jean Rouchard. The Evening Sun (Baltimore, MD) - 8-6-1 Walcott
    • Joe Lee, Brooklyn Eagle (Brooklyn, NY) - 8-7 Louis (score provided by United Press)
    • Tommy Holmes, Brooklyn Eagle (Brooklyn, NY) - Walcott
    • Ralph Frost, Brooklyn Eagle (Brooklyn, NY) - Walcott
    • Tom Ryan, sporting editor, Evening Courier (Camden, NJ) - 12-2-1 Walcott
    • Wilfrid Smith, Chicago Daily Tribube (Chicago, IL) - 8-6-1 Louis (score provided by United Press)
    • James E. Doyle, Cleveland Plain Dealer (Cleveland, OH) - 10-4-1 Walcott
    • Gordon Cobbledick, sporting editor, Cleveland Plain Dealer (Cleveland, OH) - 7-6-2 Walcott (score provided by Associated Press and United Press)
    • Jack Sharkey, International News Service - Walcott
    • Frank Eck, Associated Press - 9-6 Walcott
    • Elliott Cushing, Democrat and Chronicle (Rochester, NY) - 8-6-1 Walcott
    • Jack Cuddy, United Press - 7-6-2 Walcott
    • Ray Grody, Milwaukee Sentinel (Milwaukee, WI) - 7-6-2 Walcott (score provided by United Press)
    • George A. Barton, Minneapolis Morning Tribune (Minneapolis, MI) - 8-6-1 Walcott
    • Alan Harvey, Canadian Press - 6-5-4 Walcott
    • Gene Ward, Daily News (New York, NY) - 7-6-2 Walcott
    • Joe Trimble, Daily News (New York, NY) - 7-6-2 Louis (score provided by Associated Press and United Press)
    • Al Buck, New York Post (New York, NY) - 8-5-2 Louis.
    • Leonard Cohen, New York Post (New York, NY) - 8-6-1 Walcott
    • Jimmy Cannon, New York Post (New York, NY) - 8 rounds for Walcott
    • Anthony Marenghi, Newark Star-Ledger (Newark, NJ) - 7-6-2 Louis
    • Joe Gootter, Paterson Evening News (Paterson, NJ) - 9-6 Louis
    • Al Abrams, sporting editor, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (Pittsburgh, PA) - 8-6-1 Walcott
    • W. J. McGoogan, St. Louis Post-Dispatch (St. Louis, MO) - 7-7-1
    • John M. Flynn, sporting editor, The Berkshire Evening Eagle (Pittsfield, MA) - Walcott
    • Clif Keane, The Boston Daily Globe (Boston, MA) - 8-5-2 Louis
    • Bill Cunningham, The Boston Herald (Boston, MA) - 7-6-2 Walcott (score provided by United Press)
    • Sec Taylor, sporting editor, The Des Moines Register (Des Moines, IA) - 8-6-1 Walcott
    • Burton Hawkins, The Evening Star (Washington, DC) - 7-6-2 Walcott
    • Bill Lee, sporting editor, The Hartford Courant (Hartford, CT) - 7-4-4 Walcott
    • Charlie Tiang, sporting editor, The Kingston Daily Freeman (Kingston, NY) - 9-4-2 Walcott
    • Wendell Smith, sporting editor, The Pittsburgh Courier (Pittsburgh, PA) - 7-6-2 Louis
    • James P. Dawson, The New York Times (New York, NY) - 8-7 Louis
    • Joseph C. Nichols, New York Times - 8-7 Louis (score provided by Associated Press and United Press)
    • John Webster, The Philadelphia Inquirer and Public Ledger (Philadelphia, PA) - 11-3-1 Walcott
    • Lawton Carver, sporting editor, International News Service - 7-5-3 Louis
    • Harold W. Heinz, The Springfield Union (Springfield, MA) - 8-5-2 Walcott
    • John McNulty, PM Daily (New York, NY) - 7-6-2 Walcott
    • Tom Meany, sporting editor, PM Daily (New York, NY) - 9-6 Louis (score provided by Associated Press)
    • Nat Fleischer, The Ring (New York, NY) - 8-6-1 Louis
    • Wilbur Wood, sporting editor, New York Sun - 11-4 Walcott
    • Grantland Rice, New York Sun - 11-4 Walcott
    • Lester Bromberg, New York World Telegram - 10-5 Walcott
    • Joe Williams, New York World Telegram - Walcott
    • Max Case, New York Journal-American - Walcott
    • Frank Graham, New York Journal-American - Walcott
    • Lewis Burton, New York Journal-American - Walcott
    • Bill Corum, New York Journal-American - 8-7 Louis
    • Dan Parker, New York Daily Mirror - 9-6 Louis (according to AP) or 8-7 Louis (according to UP)
    • Jim Jennings, New York Daily Mirror - 7-6-2 Louis
    • Jesse Abramson, New York Herald Tribune - 8-7 Louis
    • Red Smith, New York Herald Tribune - 8-7 Louis
    • Ted Meier, Associated Press - 11-3-1 Walcott
    • Hugh S. Fullerton, Associated Press - Walcott. "He scored the harder punches."
    • Murray Rose, Associated Press - 9-5-1 Walcott
    • Ted Smits, Associated Press - Walcott
    • Gayle Talbot, Associated Press - 10-4-1 Walcott
    • Leo H. Peterson, sporting editor, United Press - 7-5-3 Walcott
    • Oscar Fraley, United Press - 7-6-2 Walcott
    • Bob Considine, International News Service - 8-7 Walcott
    • Davis J. Walsh, International News Service - 8-3-4 Walcott
    • Harry Grayson, Newspaper Enterprise Association - 8-4-3 Walcott
    • John Lardner, North American Newspaper Alliance - Louis
    • John Carmichael, sporting editor, Chicago Daily News - 11-4 Walcott (according to AP) or 8-4-3 Walcott (according to UP)
    • Gene Kessler, Chicago Times - 7-6-2 Walcott
    • Clair Kelley, Chicago Herald-American - 9-3-3 Walcott
    • Jack Conway, Boston American - Louis
    • Gerry Hern, Boston Post - 7-7-1 (according to AP and Al Buck of NY Post) or 7-6-2 Walcott (according to UP)
    • Ed Delaney, Philadelphia Daily News - Walcott
    • Matt Ring, Philadelphia Evening Bulletin - 8-7 Walcott
    • Whitey Lewis, Cleveland News - 8-7 Walcott
    • Franklin Lewis, Cleveland Press - Walcott
    • Shirley Povich, Washington Post - Walcott
    • Bob Addie, Washinton Times-Herald - 9-3-3 Walcott
    • Hank O'Donnell, Waterbury Republican - 12-2-1 Walcott
    • George Edmond, St. Paul Pioneer Press - 8-5-2 Louis
    • Bill Demuth, Wheeling Intelligencer - 8-5-2 Walcott
    • Robert Bre, La Presse (Paris, France) - 7-5-3 Louis
    • Jean Kroutchtain, AFP (French News Agency) - 7-5-3 Walcott
    • Bob Murphy, Detroit Evening Times, 8-5-2 Walcott
     
    Jason Thomas and hdog like this.
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,121
    48,353
    Mar 21, 2007
    It's very very like you to make this a discussion about "sides". What I am interested in is what really happened.

    What happened was, Louis was the aggressor and the champion. According to the New York Times and RING Magazine, both of whom scored the fight for Louis, both of who stressed that Louis landed more punches. You are obsessed with punch stats, it is pretty much the case that you score your fights using punchstats - here you seem very keen to ignore testimony that Louis landed more punches.

    So Louis was the champion; Louis was the aggressor; Louis may have landed more punches in the course of the fifteen rounds. How is it, that, to you, it is absolutely impossible the decision was reasonable? Because you behave, having never, ever seen the fight, like it is is a stone cold robbery.

    You behave, having personally scored the highlights quite close, that no possible reasonable case can be made for Louis to have won the fight.

    Disagrees with me about what?

    Yes, I've already covered this:

    " Nor did around 2/3 pressmen who were ringside. However, it's not so straight ahead. Two judges scored for Joe Louis, and so did 1/3 newsmen."

    This is actually inaccurate though; what I should have said was that a third of judges didn't score it for Walcott, because that single draw counts otherwise.

    So do the judges scores. 22-13 then are the generally held scores from ringside allowing newspapermen reported by Boxrec and the judges.

    This is nowhere near robbery territory.

    It just isn't, however desperately you want it to be. Pacquiao-Bradly I is a robbery we have on film and the split there is much closer to 90/10. There are more than a dozen professionals at ringside who scored it for Joe Louis, champion (or draw).

    Why do you get so hysterical about it?
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,799
    29,222
    Jun 2, 2006
    In his autobiography Joe Louis My Life,Louis was in no doubt he won the fight,and he reiterated that on national TV.
    [url]Louis and Walcott on "The Way it Was." Part 1. - YouTube[/url]

    I think that's pretty conclusive.
    John Lardner
    Bill Corum
    Red Smith
    James P Dawson
    Al Buck
    Dan Parker
    Nat Fleischer
    Jesse Abramson
    Were all heavy hitters as far as boxing reporting was concerned,the fact that they voted for Louis leads me to believe it was a pretty close fight that could have gone either way.
    Fights that close are never robberies,imo.
     
    Last edited: Dec 26, 2022
  4. Rollin

    Rollin Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,191
    6,692
    Nov 17, 2021
    Walcott won the fight, but forgot to win the belt.

    Those were the times of a singular champion and Louis was the captain America personified. He should have pressed the 14th and 15th hard.

    Granted, politics aside, I consider the fight a great, great achievement on Walcott's resume.
     
    Pugguy, mcvey and PRW94 like this.
  5. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,433
    Feb 10, 2013
    Apparently Mendoza has moved on from his racist crusade to diminish Jack Johnson's legacy and now hes on to Joe Louis, another icon. What a small little man.
     
  6. PRW94

    PRW94 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,176
    3,794
    Nov 26, 2020
    This …
     
  7. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,053
    19,146
    Oct 4, 2016
    This,, I read the same thing where Louis apologized after the fight, he knew he'd lost and had the class to admit it to Walcott.
     
  8. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,799
    29,222
    Jun 2, 2006
    Watch the footage I provided, Louis was convinced he had won, and said so in his book, and on national TV.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef and JohnThomas1 like this.
  9. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,411
    3,892
    Jun 28, 2009
    I take David Icke more seriously, and he once said live on British tv that the Queen Mother was a lizard.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,121
    48,353
    Mar 21, 2007
    Essentially, yeah. If you forcefully believe a fight you've never seen was a robbery, you better have a better ratio of ringsiders than 3-1. If a reasonable card can be found, no robbery exists. More than that though,many of the folks who have it for Walcott have it close:

    • Leo H. Peterson, sporting editor, United Press - 7-5-3 Walcott
    • Oscar Fraley, United Press - 7-6-2 Walcott
    • Bob Considine, International News Service - 8-7 Walcott
    Cards like these from the Boxrec listing that's been copied here for the thousandth time have it a very close fight. There were about ten guys at ringside who had Walcott a clear winner and 3 or 4 who had Louis a clear winner.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef and mcvey like this.
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,121
    48,353
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, he did, he said "Sorry Joe" according to Walcott in the ring. I'm not sure why this was but if I had to guess, he knew he'd got away with one and that he could have lost his title.

    But, the same people who post and re-post this apology ignore him saying he thought he'd won right after the fight, and then consistently saying he thought he'd won the fight for the rest of his life. Similarly, the people who don't like the fact that Louis may have got lucky tend to harp on the clarity he had about his victory and brush over his apology.

    These lighting-rod issues are weird and tiresome - it's essentially been the same copy-and-paste job for about 20 years now.
     
    Bonecrusher, Reinhardt and mcvey like this.
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,799
    29,222
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yes, the close scoring really is the key.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef likes this.
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,799
    29,222
    Jun 2, 2006
    It's very likely Walcott deserved the nod but no one alive is in a position to state that with any certainty.As you said it's the same circular argument made ad nauseum over and over ,similar to who deserved the win O Brien or Johnson,in a 6 rounds no decision fight? Or Hart V Johnson,where the fight was awarded on the basis of aggression and possibly colour prejudie ? Both fights can be talked about and will be as long as boxing survives.
    O Brien, being much the smaller man may claim a moral victory.and possibly Hart's willingness to make the fight earned him the win ,but we will never know.
    Personally I don't suscribe to the long held view that you have to "take the title from the champ",Louis believed this and Marvin Hagler bitterly cited that, as he" was making the fight," he should have retained his crown against Leonard.

    If you score more points you should get the nod, referees are supposed to be judging ,not champions or personalities but two corners, ,red and blue.Human nature being what it is impartiality is sometimes discarded.
    When Louis was announced as the winner many in the crowd booed, but Walcott was not expected to put up such a strong fight, and sympathy for the underdog naturally came to the fore when he did so well.

    "I read where you thought I lost the fight,well mebbe you was right,and mebbe you was wrong,but there won't be no argument about the rematch"Louis
     
    Last edited: Dec 27, 2022
  14. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,050
    45,011
    Apr 27, 2005
    Hagler claimed Leonard told him "you beat me, man" straight after their fight. Leonard has always denied it and always claimed he won the fight. Adding some credence to his words is that he is on record publically at least three times now telling the world that he lost to Hearns.

    But i digress. Louis claimed he said that to all the opponents he beat years later. He may or may not have been a touch tongue in cheek.
     
  15. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,355
    Jun 29, 2007
    Who the heck is Daivd Icke, some crazy British man I presume? Consider the source. I don't take you seriously either. The debate has reached a point where words don't fly, so you making it personal. I'll pass. Do yourself and the board a favor and skip my posts.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.